If you consider players like GOO and Dndfreak as new players.....
Well, I have nothing further to add sir.
If you consider players like GOO and Dndfreak as new players.....
Well, I have nothing further to add sir.
A1's Mustard-Seed Knight of Hope (IGN:A1 atomzed)
Also a member of PFG1 and PFG2
Rank #7 in Inaugural Meltdown Tourney
Singapore Rep for Street Fighter Tournament
"Rapid analysis, accurate judgement, and superb powers of concentration...That is all we need." - Lezard Valeth
Proud member of A1 - Evolution in Theory
Project Omega - Card Analysis and Strategy Guide
My Articles
Deck size and Probability - A case for (slightly) bigger deck
Meltdown Tier and Payout Analysis
Are they happy with Extra Sharpand Elementalis
? Didn't saw them running these cards, but who knows...
You quoted Atomzed saying this:
To respond with:A lot of ppl are very happy with MD, and PoTL and other new cards and have built winning decks around these cards. Any buff and they would be OP.
If you were not referring to people running 'MD, and PoTL and other new cards' as 'new players', then your above reply was pointless.A lot of ppl happy with extra sharp and Elemetalis, new players.
And I'm pretty sure GOO and a lot of good players still play Elementalis. Extra sharp was never a good card and no one has argued that it was so I have no idea why you are even bringing it up.
Calling next to every new card useless and saying you have never tried them doesn't lend credibility to your argument at all.
I see nothing wrong with either Extra Sharpor Elementalis
.
First off, I have played Elementalismore than any other hero. He is fine the way he his. I think he's a solid hero.
As for Extra Sharp, I see no issue with this card. From the stand point of a new player (which some cards may be designed for btw) it does two things:
-Give players a way to buff their ally to take care of stronger ones when they have no stronger option because they are new and don't have anything but the card given to them in the starter decks. (which include copies of Extra Sharp)
-Gives them a card that teaches them quickly about attachments. Learning cards can be an important part to teaching the game to someone.
I'm trying to become a game designer, so I know these things above can be important. Rather or not it was intended to do this, is irrelevant.
Was the Leader of Acolytes of A1
A1's Dimensional Eyes in the Sky
A1 Alliance: Evolution in TheoryPFG3 Leader
Was Shadow Era Community Manager
Sota, The Switch Axe Monster Hunter
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.""Humans fight to secure peace as they envision it. The trouble is, everyone's vision is different." - Ringabel
You clearly misunderstood my point. I resorted to analogy with Extra Sharpand Elementalis
to explain my point that opinions on the cards do differ, and you can happily play any card, however that doesn't mean that these cards are equal in terms of power, usefulness and versatility to some other cards.
I provided my considerations of why exactly do I think that presented cards are inferior to some others and tried to prove them. I don't see why do you taking my opinion so offensively and view it as highly biased and irrelevant. Yes, I didn't played much with those cards, yes, I didn't won any tournament, yes, I'm pretty decent player not involved in the competitive scene, but does that mean that my opinion does not deserve to be treated correspondingly as objective? If you do not agree with it please provide some explanation why is that exactly since I've done so. It very well might be that I don't understand something, then you need to explain it to me rather than saying: "Oh, I'm a tournament champion, if you didn't played this cards I won't even talk to you". Ok, that's doesn't sound like a most polite thing ever, you are not forced to reply to this thread if you have nothing else to say rather than nitpicking personally to OP.Calling next to every new card useless and saying you have never tried them doesn't lend credibility to your argument at all.
This should be my last post on this thread.
I respectfully agree that we can have differing opinions about the usefulness of the cards.
The problem is that many players, good players, have come in to explain in detail why they think that cards like PoTL and Molten Destroyer, are good cards.
You sweep their arguments away, and refused to accept their explanations and carry on dissing those cards.
Then you went on to say something to this effect "yah, all cards have their uses, much like how extra sharp/ elementalis are to new players. But good players will see that extra sharp/ elementalis are inferior".
Indirectly you are implying that PoTL and MD (which the good players have explained in detail how they are useful) are inferior cards, and that anyone who thinks they are good cards are just "new" players.
Pls look through the whole thread and look at people's response to you. Most responses in this thread tried to help you understand why PoTL and MD (among other cards) are useful.
A1's Mustard-Seed Knight of Hope (IGN:A1 atomzed)
Also a member of PFG1 and PFG2
Rank #7 in Inaugural Meltdown Tourney
Singapore Rep for Street Fighter Tournament
"Rapid analysis, accurate judgement, and superb powers of concentration...That is all we need." - Lezard Valeth
Proud member of A1 - Evolution in Theory
Project Omega - Card Analysis and Strategy Guide
My Articles
Deck size and Probability - A case for (slightly) bigger deck
Meltdown Tier and Payout Analysis
Was the Leader of Acolytes of A1
A1's Dimensional Eyes in the Sky
A1 Alliance: Evolution in TheoryPFG3 Leader
Was Shadow Era Community Manager
Sota, The Switch Axe Monster Hunter
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.""Humans fight to secure peace as they envision it. The trouble is, everyone's vision is different." - Ringabel
I accepted their arguments, admitting however that are pointing at rather niche and situational use of the cards while other cards appear to be more universal.
You simply misunderstood me, it was an analogy to support the point that any card can be useful, any deck can win, however that doesn't mean that another deck that wins more effectively and more consistently is equal to mentioned above "fun" deck.Then you went on to say something to this effect "yah, all cards have their uses, much like how extra sharp/ elementalis are to new players. But good players will see that extra sharp/ elementalis are inferior".
Indirectly you are implying that PoTL and MD (which the good players have explained in detail how they are useful) are inferior cards, and that anyone who thinks they are good cards are just "new" players.
I do appreciate all meaningful comments and I stated my opinion on them, I don't think that I did it in disrespectful manner, perhaps I've made mistake being too emotional here and there, but I hoped that it will make my text less boring to read, however that caused undesired attitude.Pls look through the whole thread and look at people's response to you. Most responses in this thread tried to help you understand why PoTL and MD (among other cards) are useful.
How does inferior cards help you learn the game? Why give Extra Sharpto the new player, so he could learn by mistake that any ally buffs aren't good in current meta? Won't it cause NPE for him, and new player might as well leave and don't give any benefit to company.
That being said I want to explain now why didn't I played mentioned above cards. If I don't see direct benefit from using the card, I won't buy it because of sheer curiosity, and this is how majority of the players will behave. If the card's description is misleading (let's admit that MD, CD and Olgoth's descriptions are pretty confusing and mentioned to me benefits from using these cards are far from obvious) I can hardly understand what the card does, I can't implement it to my play easily. With PB it's simple: do the math and figure out that this ally can deal most damage per turn without any buffs. So if I can't see usefulness of the cards I won't buy them, won't spent my gold on them or shadow crystals and so on. Therein lies the problem and that's why I think that DT should try their best to make cards more attractive without ruining the balance. It is extremely tricky, but well worth it.
Last edited by Unruler; 02-27-2012 at 02:59 AM.
So what did you do when you were "noob"? I certainly used those cards, and won games with them. As I grow as a player, so does my decklist. Sure, I wouldn't touch Extra Sharpnow, but I have seen it used. I got torn apart by a very skilled player (not naming names) on test, using...... Extra Sharp
and Elementalis
.
Extra Tough Claws - Proud Member of ETC
Articles | Decklist | Fan Fiction
Shadow Era Art Thread | PB @ DeviantArt
PFG Member | I've been interviewed!
Bookmarks