
Originally Posted by
FDL
Note: these are a couple of weeks old, I'll update them when I get home.
With nearly 50 extra games:
Example : I'm 24-8 as Tala
, 3-6 against her. So in my games, the Tala
player is 30-11 overall (73,2% winrate).
Code:
Rank Hero Win% #games
1 Tala_ 73,2% 41
2 Zhanna_ 65,9% 41
3 Lance_ 63,9% 36
4 MS_ 62,5% 24
5 Baduru_ 60,7% 28
6 Rothem_ 56,3% 16
7 Jerich_ 50,0% 20
8 Vess_ 48,8% 41
9 GB_ 47,8% 23
10 BloodF_ 40,0% 10
11 Aramia_ 33,3% 12
12 Threbi_ 32,0% 25
13 Zalada_ 31,8% 22
14 Garth_ 31,3% 16
15 Banebo_ 30,8% 13
16 Elem_ 30,8% 13
17 Praxix_ 10,0% 10
To be honest, I'm not sure it is an accurate way to assess a Hero's strength. The sample is still way too small, and there are many variables influencing the outcome of a match. There are also many contradictions: I'm 9-3 with Gravebone
but 9-2 against him, which gives him a break even overall winrate. Which is a better indication of his true strenght? (Once again, I think the small sample plays a part here).
My metagame:
Code:
1 Zaladar
9,5%
2 Baduruu
6,9%
3 MS 6,9%
4 Garth
6,5%
5 Banebow
5,6%
6 Zhanna
5,2%
7 Threbin
5,2%
8 GB 4,8%
9 Praxix
4,3%
10 BloodF 4,3%
11 Tala
3,9%
12 Gwen 3,9%
13 Boris
3,5%
14 Victor 3,0%
15 Aramia
3,0%
16 Elem 3,0%
17 Lance
2,6%
18 Vess
2,6%
19 Amber
2,2%
20 Jericho
2,2%
21 Skervox
2,2%
22 Loest
1,7%
23 Majiya
1,7%
24 Ythan
1,3%
25 Eladwen
0,9%
26 Serena
0,9%
27 Logan
0,9%
28 Ter 0,9%
29 DC 0,4%
30 Nish 0,0%
31 Rothem
0,0%
32 Raikka
0,0%
Bookmarks