Hello t!
I've been reading the new changes and the new cards with new armors, and I believe that there is a big problem.
Why there is no armor against magic? At the end, I think we will be Eladwen...
Hello t!
I've been reading the new changes and the new cards with new armors, and I believe that there is a big problem.
Why there is no armor against magic? At the end, I think we will be Eladwen
for all being Eladwen
as for armors who knows
Radioactive Jelly of Acolytes of A1Student's today, masters tomorrow
please look at for more info on AA1 or here for more info on A1
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill."
-Sun Tzu
There is a new upcoming armour which negates all spell damage, IIRC.
I wrote this before, but armour in general should protect the hero from any kind of damage, physical our magical, unless stated otherwise. I don't understand the distinction. This would actually make taking down armour like Snow Sapphire
As a matter of balance I hope they don't make one for the fighting classes. Mages have no real armor of their own against melee attacks, and penetrating magic is their only offense. Same goes for priests pretty much. Why don't mages have an "Armor of The Ages?"Originally Posted by chairo
Hello t!
I've been reading the new changes and the new cards with new armors, and I believe that there is a big problem.
Why there is no armor against magic? At the end, I think we will be Eladwen
If magic armor comes to fighters, there must be a counterbalance for the mages and priests. They must be able to unload more damage, or earlier damage to compensate
/me facepalms.
Look up spelleating bands. For rogues and wulven I think. I'm not up to par on the actual classes but I believe rogue and wulven.
Signature for rent.
he did say he looked up the new armours...shall i highlight it for you?
if i were to barter a guess, i'm thinking he means MORE armours. i'll be honest, i agree. spelleater is nice, but 1 anti-magic armour? i mean, we only have 1 ability destroyer but at least it's NEUTRAL, for god's sake.
85-Card mini-set: Gate of the Steelbound.
So you want to take a poll? ∙ Affectionate TV ∙ Transvestite Twin ∙ Racist Cow ∙ Bag of Dicks
The pen is mightier than the sword, but actions speak louder than words.
Knowledge is Power, Power Corrupts.
Sometimes a little chaos is in order.
Do we seriously need a whole bunch of armors just to fight mages?
Like... huh?
Your logic astounds me.
Signature for rent.
Yeah seriously, anti-Mage armor is dumb.
I did not say that.
SOME armor for classes exceptionally weak vs mages makes perfect sense. Ie, rogues, wulven.
But anti mage armor for everybody? Really?
A spell is 1 time use only. Think about that.
Signature for rent.
Bookmarks