The point was that every single point you made was negative; and, additionally, you had no improvements or alterations to suggest. The overall tone of your post was hypercritical and frankly, it just sounded bitchy. I applaud anyone for taking the time to come up w suggestions for the game and I voice my very poor opinion to any who have nothing but criticisms.
The summation of your post where you told the OP that his suggestions were "...unsuitable", along with the rest of your post, which was quite negative overall, is not somehow made more civil by tacking on a "no offense to you personally" at the end of the post.
You know what I find "unsuitable"? A player of one week shooting down a bunch of ideas with points which aren't very cogent (to be discovered upon playing the game more than a week) and then not even offering improvements or suggestions. My main gripe with your post is represented best in your response to idea #2, where you took on the tone that it was a stupid idea to have a card that did nothing but provide a resource upon playing it, and then acting intellectually superior with your "how about this: on your turn, just SACRIFICE it!!" When, in reality, it was a good idea, and does serve a wholly different purpose than simply sacrificing it. However, with your vast experience of a week's play, you belittled the idea as though it was useless.
Sorry if I used a bad word to describe your post. Most of the posters here can handle the verb "bitch" without becoming offended.
Here, you seemed to think this made it better, so in regards to my first post to you as well as this one: No offense to you personally. I have nothing against you or anything. Your ideas are just all bad and/or wrong.
Bookmarks