Player Tournament!

**Unfan** · 04-19-2011, 03:19 AM

Prize support: (Thanks Kyle!)
1st Place: 800 shadow crystals
2nd: 400 shadow crystals
3rd, 4th: 200 shadow crystals

Top 4 deck lists and players.

4th place CheehoG (4-0 in swiss)

Hero: Majiya

Allies
4 Infernal Gargoyle

4 Plasma Behemoth

4 Chimera

Abilities
4 Fireball

4 Lightning Strike

3 Research

2 Supernova

4 Shriek Of Vengeance

3rd place Pjoe0221 (3-1 in swiss)

Hero: Jericho Spellbane

Allies
3 Jasmine Rosecult

4 Raven

Wildhaert
2 Aldon the Brave

4 Aeon Stormcaller

Abilities
4 Tidal Waves
3 Destroy Arms

2 Curse

Equipment
3 King's Pride

4 Wizent's Staff

2nd place lyingdragon (3-1 in swiss)

Hero: Jericho Spellbane

Allies
3 Jasmine Rosecult

4 Puwen Bloodhelm

2 Blake Windrunner

3 Aldon the Brave

3 Aeon

Stromcaller

Abilities
2 Tidal Wave

3 Ice Storm

2 Healing Touch

4 Destroy Arm
1 Resurrection

1 Curse

Equipment
1 King's Pride

4 Wizent's Staff

1st place Yaemon (3-1 in swiss)

Hero: Majiya

Allies
3 Deathbone

4 Infernal Gargoyle

4 Medusil

4 Fire Snake

Abilities
4 Fireball

4 Lightning Strike

2 Supernova

2 Research

2 Shriek of Vengeance

Congratulations to everyone who earned shadow crystals. I'm not sure when they'll be credited to your account, please have patience, thanks.

**paulishuku** · 04-19-2011, 03:29 AM

Im down. +1 for sticky.

**pottersmash** · 04-19-2011, 03:37 AM

Rule #1: Everyone must play as Logan

**Kadun** · 04-19-2011, 03:42 AM

Do you want to try a 40 card minimum for the tournament?

**Unfan** · 04-19-2011, 03:51 AM

I know there is some part of the community that wants a 40 card minimum. I'll consider it. Right now I'm leaning toward no as I'm not sure it could add anything to the tournament while also setting a standard that doesn't apply to competitive outside of the tournament. Make a convincing case?

**Kadun** · 04-19-2011, 03:57 AM

Originally Posted by Unfan

I know there is some part of the community that wants a 40 card minimum. I'll consider it. Right now I'm leaning toward no as I'm not sure it could add anything to the tournament while also setting a standard that doesn't apply to competitive outside of the tournament. Make a convincing case?

It would just be an opportunity to include less optimal cards that otherwise would not see play. And would be different. I myself haven't built any 40 card decks (aside from 1.23 Darkclaw

) and imagine it may be a fun change of pace.

But either way, I'll try and make this tournament.

**paulishuku** · 04-19-2011, 03:57 AM

Originally Posted by Unfan

I know there is some part of the community that wants a 40 card minimum. I'll consider it. Right now I'm leaning toward no as I'm not sure it could add anything to the tournament while also setting a standard that doesn't apply to competitive outside of the tournament. Make a convincing case?

However, seeing as the tournament is just for fun anyways and setting a 40 card deck minimum to a competitive environment would really add nothing more than better deck building and more lively games I think it would be the best option.

**N3rd4Christ** · 04-19-2011, 04:01 AM

Originally Posted by paulishuku

However, seeing as the tournament is just for fun anyways and setting a 40 card deck minimum to a competitive environment would really add nothing more than better deck building and more lively games I think it would be the best option.

I say no to 40 card minimum. We need to stick to current game rules otherwise we cant really test decks with 40 cards vs other decks with 30 cards.

If we stick to current rules Im in again.

Also this is not FUN this is the "FIRST" SE Tournament. if you win this you will get fame and glory (your name mentioned on a post).