Why using a glitch to your advantage is NOT wrong.

[chanson311]

You cannot try indefinately. If you didnt like 3-1 for example and changed to 2-2 when you reload 3-1 again there are still same cards included as the first time.

One of the solutions (not sure how good though) would be to throw in one booster extra..

You are giving yourself the option to look at 4 different card pools which is unfair... And yet I admit I do this because I know everyone else does and I want to play on the same level.

[Keith☆Star]

Abusing a bug/exploit to win isnt right, especially if wearing a guilds tag on your IGN
This will not only put a bad light on you, but on the guild too
Peeps will look at BP thinking "hey those are the guys that cheat to win! lets stay away from them and lets join an other guild"
Is this what you want?
Do you really want to be pointed as cheater?
You can have every reason of this world, you can say whatever you want to defend yourself, but now its too late, way too late
Youve been caught
No more excuses now

[SamuelJ]

You are giving yourself the option to look at 4 different card pools which is unfair... And yet I admit I do this because I know everyone else does and I want to play on the same level.

You couldn't even play on the same level if they let you choose any 30 cards of your choice <3 you!

[chanson311]

You couldn't even play on the same level if they let you choose any 30 cards of your choice

Until this post Flynn was the biggest jerk in this thread.... Way to raise the bar!

[Kip thorp]

It's not game breaking, I totally agree with that (as nerull said, it actually creates some strategy) , what I am suggesting is that every player should be aware in-game that the function to change ratio exist and can be used (if the function is accepted and retained).

+1. A am most certainly not aware of this! Maybe it's irrelevant on an iPad, but in any case rules are rules and put there to keep the field level, I picture everybody yelling about unbalanced cards! If you can unbalance whole decks then what the point of playing.

[1ndeed]

Flynn, I can see your point. But also you should try to understand the others' perspective. We dont all have to agree. But still we can better understand each other.

I agree that Wulven should do more testing prior to releasing on the live server. (In a reasonable amount of time. The company is rather young so I hope in the future they can get it right.)

But if other players feel exploiting a bug is wrong, and you still do it, you must understand others will not like it and take it as intentional cheating. Its not as bad as, say, hacking the server and altering your cards, but still, we try to make the game as fair as possible, playing by the rules set down for the game. This makes competition more interesting and rewarding.

Anyway, TL,DR; I can see your point, and I hope you can also see the opposite perspective

Good luck with future SE endeavors

[Raphael Majere]

+1. A am most certainly not aware of this! Maybe it's irrelevant on an iPad, but in any case rules are rules and put there to keep the field level, I picture everybody yelling about unbalanced cards! If you can unbalance whole decks then what the point of playing.

Aa1 jeromy has an excellent starter guide to meltdown (which i recommend all new players to check it out for meltdown) , which he mentioned the booster ratio:

http://www.shadowera.com/showpost.php?p=391180

[Gondorian]

I liked the part where he said he wanted to move on, in his new thread about something that happened ages ago.

[Atomzed]

Unlike the tiny-decks bug, this one is also available to all clients and respect the 30 cards limit, so I don't see it as a gamebreaking issue.

The thing is where do you draw the line on what glitch can be used, and what can not be used? If you go by, 'oh this is a minor glitch, I will use it then', the logic is similar to how flyn is using.

[Raphael Majere]

The thing is where do you draw the line on what glitch can be used, and what can not be used? If you go by, 'oh this is a minor glitch, I will use it then', the logic is similar to how flyn is using.

I am going to grab some popcorn.