Hello t!
I've been reading the new changes and the new cards with new armors, and I believe that there is a big problem.
Why there is no armor against magic? At the end, I think we will be Eladwen...
Printable View
Hello t!
I've been reading the new changes and the new cards with new armors, and I believe that there is a big problem.
Why there is no armor against magic? At the end, I think we will be Eladwen...
for all being Eladwen i dont think that will happen
as for armors who knows
There is a new upcoming armour which negates all spell damage, IIRC.
I wrote this before, but armour in general should protect the hero from any kind of damage, physical our magical, unless stated otherwise. I don't understand the distinction. This would actually make taking down armour like Snow Sapphire more manageable and at the same time provide some sort of protection against burn.
As a matter of balance I hope they don't make one for the fighting classes. Mages have no real armor of their own against melee attacks, and penetrating magic is their only offense. Same goes for priests pretty much. Why don't mages have an "Armor of The Ages?"
If magic armor comes to fighters, there must be a counterbalance for the mages and priests. They must be able to unload more damage, or earlier damage to compensate
/me facepalms.
Look up spelleating bands. For rogues and wulven I think. I'm not up to par on the actual classes but I believe rogue and wulven.
he did say he looked up the new armours...shall i highlight it for you?
if i were to barter a guess, i'm thinking he means MORE armours. i'll be honest, i agree. spelleater is nice, but 1 anti-magic armour? i mean, we only have 1 ability destroyer but at least it's NEUTRAL, for god's sake.
Do we seriously need a whole bunch of armors just to fight mages?
Like... huh?
Your logic astounds me.
Yeah seriously, anti-Mage armor is dumb.
I did not say that.
SOME armor for classes exceptionally weak vs mages makes perfect sense. Ie, rogues, wulven.
But anti mage armor for everybody? Really?
A spell is 1 time use only. Think about that.