remove Bloodlust`s art

[Leviosablade]

Ya this is ridiculous mtg has more ridiculous art In it's history and once more it's art, it represents an emotion a feeling lust= a deep desire a need. Blood= red stuff, and a woman naked who's parts are covered by shadows and it's bad ass looking, you can tell she loves blood on even a sexual level making the card gruesome actually if anything it's sadistic but ya don't complain about the big boobs and big butts that most the other females are flaunting so let's change those too guys!
[btw I don't want change the art is amzaing]

[Peithoson]

Ya this is ridiculous mtg has more ridiculous art In it's history and once more it's art, it represents an emotion a feeling lust= a deep desire a need. Blood= red stuff, and a woman naked who's parts are covered by shadows and it's bad ass looking, you can tell she loves blood on even a sexual level making the card gruesome actually if anything it's sadistic but ya don't complain about the big boobs and big butts that most the other females are flaunting so let's change those too guys!
[btw I don't want change the art is amzaing]

o_O you're looking too far into the art

[plo]

it represents an emotion a feeling lust= a deep desire a need. Blood= red stuff, and a woman naked who's parts are covered by shadows and it's bad ass looking, you can tell she loves blood on even a sexual level making the card gruesome actually if anything it's sadistic but ya don't complain about the big boobs and big butts that most the other females are flaunting so let's change those too guys!

Very poetic indeed one might even get inspiration from her to write a book

[Leviosablade]

o_O you're looking too far into the art

I didn't look into it enough! Lol I could go into deep detail that'll prolly be way off

[Ganjamus]

The card has already been printed so I really doubt they would change it now. I rarely see it played anyway.

[gamerhellborn]

She is hot if u dont like it dont use that card.

[Darkloki]

I thought this was a joke thread. I mean.... it's not even a real picture, it's freakin' drawing. If that bothers you, than you may have some other issues to deal with.

[Preybird]

o_O you're looking too far into the art

i built an entire character based around the art, who played a major role in my early fan fiction.

[SET Colosal]

Ya this is ridiculous mtg has more ridiculous art In it's history and once more it's art, it represents an emotion a feeling lust= a deep desire a need. Blood= red stuff, and a woman naked who's parts are covered by shadows and it's bad ass looking, you can tell she loves blood on even a sexual level making the card gruesome actually if anything it's sadistic but ya don't complain about the big boobs and big butts that most the other females are flaunting so let's change those too guys!
[btw I don't want change the art is amzaing]

I'm starting to worry about you :/

[bobrossw]

So I think this is the wrong sort of solution...I think what could be done is a re-release with brand new art for several cards (including bloodlust). But for that you'd really need the game to 1) have all finished art in SF and 2) to be popular enough that this would be worthwhile. I don't think we're quite there...so my sense is that the first step for now is to just encourage devs and artist to make an effort to consider the possible perspectives of new (particularly female) players as they develop new cards, and maybe we can revisit those old cards en-masse at a later date. One possible workaround could be adding new art to the digital game only and then including a 'PG' checkbox in the digital game that allows you to default to PG versions of certain potentially offensive cards when viewing them. Again, I'm not sure what sort of priority this would be for developers. It's certainly a lower priority than finishing all the art for SF.