Revert them now. They're completely useless. Now that the deck limit is up to 40, it won't be as common to play 3-4 in a row.
Revert them now. They're completely useless. Now that the deck limit is up to 40, it won't be as common to play 3-4 in a row.
As a sandra&HBM hater, i think Drakkon is right.
"Rastas don't believe in violence... Rastas don't believe... Rastas know." -Bob Marley-
✡
♔ Winner of the Multi-Post Streak Challenge ♔
✩✯✭✮*’”⁷ᵔᵕᵔ∞*°゜ﾟ⁰ᵒ☉●•⋆.ᵢᵢᵢ₇.｡･°'¨⋋ⓚⓔⓝⓣⓤⓔⓠⓤⓘ⋌¨'°･｡.ᵢ₇₇₇.⋆•●☉ᵒ⁰゜ﾟ°*∞ᵔᵕᵔ⁷‘“*✮✭✯✩
⊰☠ ℑcℯ ℰℒℱ ☠⊱
they can keep sandra as she is but they have to lower her cost to at least 3, maybe even 2, at a cost of 4 no one in there right mind would use her
They should just give a resource instead of taking one from the opponent.
iClipse - A1's Twilight Manipulator - A1 : Evolution in Theory
Part of PFG
- My psychiatrist told me I was crazy and I said I want a second opinion. He said okay, you're ugly too.
- Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
- With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
- I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure.
- A diplomat is someone who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you will look forward to the trip.
?UOTE=iClipse;118510]They should just give a resource instead of taking one from the opponent.[/QUOTE]
like if your opponent has more resources then you you gain a resource when she is summoned? yeah that would make her much more useful.
I'd rather see her give an extra SE when summoned.
Posting Permissions
Originally Posted by Drakkon
Bookmarks