My 1,000th post - Logan "Weapon X" deck - 30 cards

[Seth]

I have yet to post my current deck cept for guild forums.

Sometimes I think about posting my decks to help new players out and get some helpful critiques. But then I think "Do I want to fight against this deck a thousand times?" and then I never do

[Raphael Majere]

Quote Originally Posted by N3rd4Christ
I have yet to post my current deck cept for guild forums.

Sometimes I think about posting my decks to help new players out and get some helpful critiques. But then I think "Do I want to fight against this deck a thousand times?" and then I never do

I think we are over-estimating ourselves. heh heh.

My guess is that about 5% of the total number of SE players are formalities. Lurkers probably half of the 5%.

[Raphael Majere]

Hi Raphael, love your decks!! its more my style of play.. i'm using your "wolverine" deck when i saw this "weapon x". is this an upgrade from the "wolverine" deck or another take on logan?

This is another version. And it's better.

So abandon the Wolverine deck. I may make changes to the post on Wolverine.

[Raphael Majere]

I've already faced 4-5 clones in my last 10 games

I highly doubt this! hahaha...

I face a logan like erm, one in 100 games?

[Raphael Majere]

hi, same as havokkk, i often try your decks !
why do you prefer Brutalis to Carniboar in this one ?
Thaddeus, War Banner and Bloodlust could help Carniboar to grow stronger

Carniboar was too situational for me.

If you go second and your opponent does a t2 puwen, you are stopped dead in tracks.

Plus, Brut can 'ping' Jas, survive the rd and Logan can finish her off.

This is significant. Brut lives for another day.

With the large ally-power in this deck, Fat Boar is excessive.

[Raphael Majere]

I made a bloody mistake.

Forget to add shriek(s)!

So, edited OP.

- 1 Bloodlust
+1 shriek

[N3rd4Christ]

I highly doubt this! hahaha...

I face a logan like erm, one in 100 games?

I wish I was joking, I was playing on my incognito acct so I can't disclose name but I counted 4 Logan's in 11 matches

[TotallyImba]

Its a great deck which works really nicely but I was just wondering whether Dark Flayer would work instead of Brutalis? I know he has less HP but it could also work with Logan's ability. Also if a Gargoyle attacks your Brutalis you will do 0 damage in return where as the Flayer will do 1 damage allowing you to remove him from the board with Logan.

Just a thought.

Also is 1 Shreik enough, especially against 30 card Gwen?

[Raphael Majere]

Its a great deck which works really nicely but I was just wondering whether Dark Flayer would work instead of Brutalis? I know he has less HP but it could also work with Logan's ability. Also if a Gargoyle attacks your Brutalis you will do 0 damage in return where as the Flayer will do 1 damage allowing you to remove him from the board with Logan.

Just a thought.

Also is 1 Shreik enough, especially against 30 card Gwen?

Good question.

Regarding DF, it's better than Boar but has similar survivability problems.

T2 DF cannot beat T2 Puwen.

Plus, if you go second, you do a T2 DF, your opponent does a T3 Death Magic, it's BYE BYE DF.

I do that to my opponent all the time.

Shriek - I am open to adding more.

If you see my 1.27 Mega-rush write-up, I said that Board control is the most important thing from t1 to t5, hence you won't be casting shriek during these turns.

For Logan, he also needs to squeeze in casting BF.

I wish I could put in more shrieks.

The Blood lusts are very important. So are the War banners.

We cannot cut down on the 3 CC allies or Brutalis or PB or SK.

If you really wanna try, I might recommend:

0 - War banner, 3 shrieks.

[TotallyImba]

Do you know whether they are going to be changing Logan's ability in 1.28?