The idea is that i have a .7 probability of getting EITHER snakes or a brutalis on the first two turns, whereas if i would drop 2 snakes, that would be a (*does math*).6 hmmm maybe you're right, .1 difference doesn't really seem worth it, i didn't do that math untill now, but i estimated around .2 difference, which would be worth it. Snakes are out.
I'm not convinced Chimeras are kinda weak, i think of them as a kind of pseudo-gargoyles, with 1 more cc to account for the ability... But I'll go testing today, without them.
Here is just directly disagree, Soul Reaper is clearly the better healing card, the only time Conversion does a noticeable amount of healing is when you use life infusion+a tough creature (read:spend 3 cards to heal 9/10 life) Whereas Soul Reaper would always cost just one card, and most of the time heals for a lot more (at least in this deck) Where Soul Reaper doesn't work is with the fast weenie rushes, but i strongly doubt conversion being that much better there. No, the only reason i would use conversion, is for it's combo with mind control, and i'm just not convinced that's worth it.
And i thank you for it, and am testing the changes...Down to 42 by the way...
So you want to keep Soul Reaper, eh? I find is it too situational. Keep 1 if you want to keep them.
Fire Snakes are high in Vitamin D.
Account for Gondorian to put crystalz into: Reshiram99
Testing using one Soul Reaper...By the way no snakes/chimeras seems to work!
Removed one Armor of Ages, 3 Bad Santa's (weren't working that well), one Life infusion, and one Soul Reaper. Added one Bazaar. 36 cards at the moment.
Last edited by vforvalar; 06-18-2011 at 03:24 PM.
Bookmarks