Close

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Net Trap

  1. #1
    The Creator Kyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,302
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0

    Net Trap


  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    20
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I think this card should only cost 1 resource because the only difference right now between a dead enemy and a 2 turns of exhaustion is 1 resource. This will be an amazing for Gwenneth Truesight when Hunter Heroes are finally able to attack.
    Also when new traps are made that do more than just exhaust but less than kill, they can cost 2 resources.

  3. #3
    Senior Member AnAdolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    8,295
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Actually, Gwenneth is expected to have an ability change in the next update, http://forums.toucharcade.com/showpo...&postcount=445

    As for dropping to 1 resource, that's probably for the best; can't think of a reason not to offhand.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    20
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AnAdolt View Post
    Actually, Gwenneth is expected to have an ability change in the next update, http://forums.toucharcade.com/showpo...&postcount=445

    As for dropping to 1 resource, that's probably for the best; can't think of a reason not to offhand.
    Wow, that is quite the change to her ability. That makes this card more useful as a sacrifice unless it gets changed to 1 resource.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    61
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    When I review card list, I found there are just two trap cards. Where is the bluff here? When opponent costs 2, you know it's Net Trap, when opponent costs 3, you know it's Death Trap. The developers could add more Trap in near term, but it edges out the slot for Hunter getting other interesting abilities. Maybe when players cast Net Trap, they could choose to pay any additional cost to bluff? (in case there will be 4, 5 or even X cost Trap in the future). The Traps are good, but they are not really surprise right now. They are just the same as any other class' items. They got no unique personalities. It's a pity.

    Another idea: designing one 2 cost and one 3 cost Trap card. But actives when an ally ATTACKS. I.e. "Play face down. When next enemy ally attacks you, destroy it". OR, "Play face down. When next enemy ally attacks friendly ally, deals 4 damage to it.". Thus, when an Hunter player casts a Trap, should you summon another ally or attack with your existing one?

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    20
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I like the idea of on attack

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    18
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Why is it that the Portal (and its first strike ability) superseeds this trap? Nothing gets me more frustrated than having a mage summon an ally who gets snared by this trap and still attacks me! Grrrrrr....

  8. #8
    Senior Member ROAR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    264
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    7
    This card costs too much compared to other cards that "trap" allies for the same price (Crippling blow or Captured Prey). Reducing it on 1 casting cost or lengthing the time of the trapped period would make it more balanced. I personally prefer the latter - extending the trapped peroid.
    Guild: Marksmen

    "We are Hunters, and you are our prey.. Fear not the allies you can see. Fear only the arrow that will pierce through your hero.."

    Please visit my blog for more card ideas. Comments and suggestions welcome!

  9. #9
    Senior Member AnAdolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    8,295
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    @Nizuul Conversely, Portal users could then counterargue, why should Net Trap override Portal? Rather than taking sides, I'm more interested in a discussion on what should be done with conflicts like this.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    18
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    You're right. No sides, just logic.
    Ally uses portal to zap into battle. Does he avoid trap, attack and then fall into trap? or just fall into trap?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •