Close

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member Veles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,240
    Tournaments Joined
    29
    Tournaments Won
    2

    Preview of Balance Changes for 3.65

    Hi all,

    Based on community feedback and performance of the newest cards, we've decided on following changes to improve overall balance of the game.


    Isadora Stormrage - Ability changed to "When you summon a Mage ability, Isadora is readied. When Isadora attacks an ally on your turn, ability damage to opposing allies is increased by 1 until the end of the turn. 1: Target opposing hero or ally takes 2 electrical damage." (from "When you summon an ability, Isadora is readied. When Isadora attacks an ally on your turn, ability damage to opposing allies is increased by 1 until the end of the turn. 1: Target opposing hero or ally takes 2 electrical damage.").

    Eye of the Dark Forest - Durability reduced to 1 (from 2).

    Gemstone Javelin - Class restricted to Warrior and Elemental. Durability increased to 4 (from 3). Ability changed to "0SE: Target opposing ally takes X damage, where X is Gemstone Javelin's attack + durability. Gemstone Javelin is destroyed." (from "0SE: Target opposing ally takes X damage, where X is Gemstone Javelin's attack + durability. Gemstone Javelin is destroyed at the end of the turn.")

    Lilyt of Orem - Casting cost reduced to 5 (from 6 ). Attack reduced to 2 (from 3). Health reduced to 7 (from 9). Ability activation reduced to 2 (from 3).

    Jace Mortlock - Health increased to 7 (from 6).

    Axiom the Soulless - Ability activation reduced to 1 (from 2).
    Last edited by Veles; 12-28-2018 at 07:59 AM.

    Design Team Leader

    Check out this thread for some awesome articles and guides.

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
    ― Nikola Tesla




  2. #2
    DP Visionary SET Colosal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Argentina GMT-3
    Posts
    6,555
    Tournaments Joined
    38
    Tournaments Won
    2
    Can't wait to see how this affects meta.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Arcadius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Montenegro,Cursed Island
    Posts
    160
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Ok balance although I'm not fine with eye change .. but that's just only coz I like wulven. Not wulven company, wulven class.
    I thought some older cards might be revived .. there were few nice suggestions from community.. especially from twilight vanila who spend a lot of time ��
    Sinister Always Pays His Debts

    European Shadow Era Champion

    First SEF champion

    Wanna join A1 ? Contact me on TELEGRAM @MrArcy

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Still not enough to make me want to play anymore

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    133
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    First make some bad classes playable and then make them unplayable again? Sorry for GB, he's back to being complete trash. BS was the best card for activating Isadora abi.
    A1: Evolution in Theory

  6. #6
    Senior Member meeklosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    On the bridge of the Enterprise
    Posts
    1,432
    Tournaments Joined
    25
    Tournaments Won
    4
    Thank you for the quick response, we appreciate all of your efforts, guys.

    I never liked to comment changes that are only on the paper and not seen in the action yet, but what I can say is that, at least, it sounds better than it was.



    One Question though, and I know many are interested in it. It is maybe not related to this thread specifically, but to balance/card changes in general.

    Do you guys have any plans for returning the banned cards with some reworks/adjustments?

    IMHO banning card for good is not the most elegant way, especially in a digital card games were you can take so many advantages of it.
    Knight of the Dragon Order (symbol)
    Warrior of the Blue Phoenix (click)
    Greatness, Reborn


    My current achievements:Achievements
    PFG3 Member

    FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA
    https://twitter.com/meeeklosh
    https://www.twitch.tv/meeklosh
    https://www.youtube.com/c/milosradojevicvp

  7. #7
    Senior Member Veles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,240
    Tournaments Joined
    29
    Tournaments Won
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by meeklosh View Post
    Thank you for the quick response, we appreciate all of your efforts, guys.

    I never liked to comment changes that are only on the paper and not seen in the action yet, but what I can say is that, at least, it sounds better than it was.



    One Question though, and I know many are interested in it. It is maybe not related to this thread specifically, but to balance/card changes in general.

    Do you guys have any plans for returning the banned cards with some reworks/adjustments?

    IMHO banning card for good is not the most elegant way, especially in a digital card games were you can take so many advantages of it.
    That decision is up to token holders and/or future directors and DT will act according to that decision.

    Design Team Leader

    Check out this thread for some awesome articles and guides.

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
    ― Nikola Tesla




  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Quebec, Canada (GTM-4)
    Posts
    81
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    why not just restrict to one per deck

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    15
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    As a rothem player, I thought Nerf javelin will kill rothem and javelin itself immediately,,,,4cc jav only can be used once(destroyed after use abilty)and jav + plunderer only create 3 damages in one attack,4cc is looks expensive,3 damages that's same as plunderer​ takes other weapons like splinth where it's only 3cc cheaper than jav,
    And cant attack twice hurts rothem much while that just effectively when rothem use it ability for 5se, it's huge se needed.
    I prefer nerf javelin only for Shadow heroes and restricted class to warrior and elemental without any changes of ability

  10. #10
    Senior Member Rajawali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    181
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Suiseiseki View Post
    As a rothem player, I thought Nerf javelin will kill rothem and javelin itself immediately,,,,4cc jav only can be used once(destroyed after use abilty)and jav + plunderer only create 3 damages in one attack,4cc is looks expensive,3 damages that's same as plunderer​ takes other weapons like splinth where it's only 3cc cheaper than jav,
    And cant attack twice hurts rothem much while that just effectively when rothem use it ability for 5se, it's huge se needed.
    I prefer nerf javelin only for Shadow heroes and restricted class to warrior and elemental without any changes of ability
    You can still attack twice, but you need to Attack first and then activate its ability. With the increase of Durability the damage output would still be the same with previous version

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •