Close

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    346
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    With more and more good passives we need more and better answers to them. Turrent is far from good enough to win games on its own. It has to have some other source of damage to kill most things. It's a great card, but if every good card released gets nerfed because it's better than old ones we might as well not have new cards.
    IGN: TJ dubdub
    TG: @tjdubdub

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    83
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Reduced to 2 dura it would still be good but more balanced.

  3. #23
    Community Manager SEF Mango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The space in between your nightmares
    Posts
    1,012
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TJ dubdub View Post
    With more and more good passives we need more and better answers to them. Turrent is far from good enough to win games on its own. It has to have some other source of damage to kill most things. It's a great card, but if every good card released gets nerfed because it's better than old ones we might as well not have new cards.
    I still feel it needs to lose 1 durability. There are more and more allies coming into the game with strong game altering abilities. Some hero classes struggle to remove those allies more than others.

    That is just a product of playing certain classes.

    It is fine to have tools to help deal with troublesome allies. I just think Stun Turret is a bit over the top.

    If it stayed the same, I would not have anything negative to say. I'm not 100% in the nerf camp. Just have a feeling that it is a bit too much is all.
    "Is he a man? Or, is he a mango?" - Gondorian

    Join our Telegram Community.

    Join Shadow Era on Social Media: Facebook|Twitter

  4. #24
    Senior Member Rajawali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    191
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I do think 3 durability is too much comparing to the other passive ability removal card. I suggest to reduce the durability into 2 and raise the damage into 2. Or if you want to keep the 3 durability it should add +1 shadow energy cost to activate it.

  5. #25
    Lead Developer / Designer Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    24,080
    Tournaments Joined
    1000
    Tournaments Won
    999
    Blog Entries
    1
    I didn't want to get involved in the discussion while it was happening, but I totally agree that 3.61 Stun Turret was too much value for the cost. The card was showing up in so many places and usually having decent impact the turn it hits, but then still sticks for another 2 turns (or more) as well. It could even be used 3 times and also blown up before end of turn for value as well (e.g. Melt Down, Ravagers). Dropping to 2 durability still seems very decent to me.

  6. #26
    Community Manager SEF Mango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The space in between your nightmares
    Posts
    1,012
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Just to touch on this after the change, it is still incredibly effective and has cost me games.

    The 2 shots is still game altering. Still a great value to have 1-2 in some decks.
    "Is he a man? Or, is he a mango?" - Gondorian

    Join our Telegram Community.

    Join Shadow Era on Social Media: Facebook|Twitter

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •