Close

View Poll Results: Would you like Skervox changed or left alone?

Voters
63. You may not vote on this poll
  • CHANGE - Only disable up to 2 target opposing allies (rest stays same)

    28 44.44%
  • LEAVE - Disables all opposing allies

    35 55.56%
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 71
  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    572
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gondorian View Post
    It has to either survive a turn or be brought in with Haste to act like 4cc item destruction every turn.

    Lythian Shackles and Enslave the Beast are pretty good for dealing with it.
    Sounds good
    thought it was at summon ability activated. makes more sense now.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Veles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,394
    Tournaments Joined
    29
    Tournaments Won
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by BlastMan View Post
    why exile and why the bounce back? why not just revert it to the original? he wasnt op before, people just complained they couldnt cast 3 things out of fear... then you nerf them and people now complain about stall, mainly skervox... see the cycle?
    Exile is there so you can stop item and attachment recycling. So far in the game there was no efficient way for doing that. For example, against decks like control Vess removing one attachment is very inefficient because she can easily recycle it back with Braxnorian Veteran. Sledgehammer is also hard to deal with for many decks and this takes care of it as well and also eliminates option for Reserve Weapon bringing it back. Same goes for Victor's many traps.

    Another reason for exiling is adding more synergy for Warped Desert. So far, aside Loest's ability and few exotic plays you could only get allies through Desert.

    The bounce back is so his ability can not be spammed too many times. You play it, you wait a turn to possibly activate the ability. Opponent has a turn to react by killing it or playing around it. If his ability goes off he is not immediately returned to hand so you can not replay him instantly, but wait to play him next turn. And then wait one more turn for him to be ready to activate ability.

    Old version that took 4 items/abilities into consideration was indeed still good against stall but bad vs many other MU, because of which players rarely added them to their decks. For a tech card to be good it needs to have certain level of usability across several MUs.

    Older version that took 3 items/abilities into consideration however was too oppressive because opponents didn't have time to react to it. It was an ok tech vs stall but too good vs entire warrior class. If SoE/Vermin set off not only did you lose valuable item or attachment but opponent got even more in tempo by playing solid ally. What this new version does is to give opponent a chance to react. It is much more interactive that way. A midrange deck like most warriors are should be able to deal with it in numerous ways, starting from their hero abilities, weapons already in play, retreats, allies on board, etc. Heavy control decks on the other hand are greedy in ally removal and tend to set up their board to trade off many allies at once. This means they have very little single ally removal and it is more probable that SoE/Vermin will live a turn against them to use their abilities then they are against a midrange deck.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlastMan View Post

    why cost 2 and the 1 damage? sorcerer is 0, exiles and gets a bounce back, which isnt really much of a cost and can benefit
    The cost of 2 is partly because Vermin is cheaper than Sorcerer to cast. 2 resources to play Vermin and 2c to activate ability adds up to 4 resources in total. Damage is there so opponent gets a chance to kill it off. And while destroying stuff is worse than exiling it Vermin does have a chance to use his ability in successive turns. There are also ravager synergies and synergies with damaged friendly allies. By destroying items he can occasionally trigger your own Crucible and be a trigger for upcoming Chaos Engine. Another reason for his ability costing 2 is to limit tempo a bit. Activating ability should slow down a bit his controler. Historically he was played in very snowball decks like Elementalis. Controler should pay some tempo so opponent gets some breathing room to recover. For example Elemenatalis player that has 5 or 6 resources will need to decide between using Vermin's ability and playing a 3/4cc ally or playing Exaltation/MC.

    why this change? when did this become a problem? did i miss something?
    Cost was put to 2 because going first it was too good to play loom on t1 and bazzar on t2 to benefit fully from Bazaar draw. Having two infinite draw engines meant they have higher chances to draw one of them early on or if opponent destroyed one or both to draw another copy. If they are not destroyed Loom sticking forever meant all other copies were easy sacrificial choices later in the game. So this is meant to slow down their set up a bit.

    At the same time this new version should be better for tempo oriented decks.


    sorcerer and vermin. the thing that made them usable was the on summon ability. these changes, you may not even benefit from their ability. they will be the big target and get killed before you can use them. the only good thing to say here is that portal and lance decks could be fun and meta worthy. as well as abilities that ready allies. in other decks, they are less viable than they were at 4items/abilities on summon.
    I explained this above.
    Last edited by Veles; 11-08-2017 at 10:27 PM.
    Retired Card Game Designer

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments.
    The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    247
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Upon further review this change to vermin and sorcerer feels like a nerf to them. I didn't read everyone's posts sorry if I'm beating a dead horse. The come into play ability made the useable. Now they need to be on the board for a turn. Compare those come into play disable cards vs the activated ones, huge difference in use and playability it's action is guaranteed. This will not improve things as intended, they have a turn to deal with the threat. Most decks aren't capable to hasting it. A simple disable puts a stop to using it(if skervox was what everyone was complaining about, guess what he can disable pretty easy, even with the nerf). Please reconsider this. I'd rather keep them in their current state or add locations to the list and keep it 4.

    Wulven class also needs the Brax issue looked at. They suffer in the meantime.

    Who ever said soul reaper is right. Which is why I use it. I've said before it has the potential to be the most powerful card in the game. Prax mill would die though.

    That undead armor too. Too cheap and easy. No prevention, and extremely relevant in current meta.

    Seek wisp guy, everyone gets hot when shard zal is played, cuz it's too quick and easy, well this guy is as fast and way more versatile.
    Last edited by Dvsklown; 11-09-2017 at 01:56 AM.

  4. #44
    Senior Member AmberFade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    403
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I like the introduction of versatile counterplay in SoE and Vermin. Apart of that I dont understand the heavy emphazis on Skrevox, its only 1 NPE deck out of many.

    If thats about that 3dy dude, I understand it even less. The only thing he did is apply the old millstallker build on Skrevox. Its not the first time someone made it high with an NPE deck(Nookie did that all the time for years with millstallker). Its neither new, nor especially strong or impressive that it would require to nerf Skrevox into oblivion.

    I am not rly sure about the loom change, while I like the idea its kind of a bad card now. You can use it 3x and have to spend 2 CC for both players drawing a card. Imo its either keep 2 cost and draw only for yourself (makes it an additional draw engine that coule be used by many decks). High CC cost dont stop cancerdecks anyway since they accumulate insane amound of ressources realy quick.

    About the new ability, I welcome the change to 2 allies if you reduce the cost to 3SE. The old ability is awfull outside of stall so tweaking it sounds like a thing worth trying.
    Last edited by AmberFade; 11-09-2017 at 03:44 AM.
    IGN: BP AmberFade
    TG: @AmberFade


    WotBP Trophy Room:Achievements
    Legendary Blademaster of Gaderi
    Warrior of the Blue Phoenix
    Greatness, Reborn

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    108
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Can we please stop changing and tweaking card that people have payed for? Also can we please stop trying to force people to play similar decks (e.g., strong tribal synergies, or strongly encouraging very ally-heavy builds)?

    Stall is fine. It's hard to play, and hard to play against. That is good, it makes the game less boring.

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    It's stupid, sov is enough to take down the rain and win. ppl just don't take even 1 of that card.

  7. #47
    Senior Member segalion's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    607
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Maybe sorcerer can be shuffeled to deck instead bounced to hand?

    Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
    In the beginning the Universe was created.
    This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

    IGN: TJ Segalion - Green Creatures from other planets can also go Juggernauts !

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    247
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by smallnumber View Post
    It's stupid, sov is enough to take down the rain and win. ppl just don't take even 1 of that card.
    Sov would likely be rarely used, slowing the deck down, sucks paying twice the cost of the thing you are destroying too

  9. #49
    Senior Member Spartan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    162
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I think that sorc returning to hand after a use of his abi its a drawback, not an adbantage!

    If he stayed on board he could use his abi next turn if survived, but he will return to hand not being able to do so.

    Why you find returning to hand so good to say is too strong?
    Member of A1 family

  10. #50
    Senior Member AmberFade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    403
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I think you are overhyping SoE a lil bit, imo the old version was stronger. His new ability is only a real deal if he gets hasted, else he has to survive the turn to be able to use it. If we look at good decks its highly unlikely anyone who has 3 items out will let him alive uncontested. Kinda reminds me of Twillight Ritualist.
    IGN: BP AmberFade
    TG: @AmberFade


    WotBP Trophy Room:Achievements
    Legendary Blademaster of Gaderi
    Warrior of the Blue Phoenix
    Greatness, Reborn

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •