Close

View Poll Results: Do you think we should reduce max deck size to 60 + hero for Quick Match?

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    10 27.78%
  • No

    26 72.22%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Devoted Fan Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    24,067
    Tournaments Joined
    1000
    Tournaments Won
    999
    Blog Entries
    1

    Reducing Max Deck Size to 60 Cards + Hero in QM

    We have a thread and poll about potentially reducing the deck size to 80 + hero for quick match. The votes seem split right now.

    But, in the comments, some people said that it was not enough of a reduction and they'd be happier with an even bigger reduction. Well, this thread is an attempt to find out more.

    What do you think?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    587
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I did vote yes, but just to be able to play mill prax once again. I think if we make this change mill prax will dominate the meta and will have to be nerfed somehow
    I milled fat Garth with rush Loest. Twice.
    I stalled Moonstaller with Rothem.
    I played Ter with monopoly cards and 4x toll bridge and managed to win a tournament.
    I cast Portal and Kris in one turn and lived to tell the tale.

  3. #3
    Devoted Fan Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    24,067
    Tournaments Joined
    1000
    Tournaments Won
    999
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by dejvo View Post
    I did vote yes, but just to be able to play mill prax once again. I think if we make this change mill prax will dominate the meta and will have to be nerfed somehow
    I wondered that too, but that would be OK and reasonably quick to address. He's balanced right now assuming people could go up to 120 cards.

    I'm in the process of gathering a lot of stats to inform any decision at the moment.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    418
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    60 seems about right but idk maybe a bit more like 65

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    223
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    120,80,60...what next.Will we have a poll until 30 cards deck.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    34
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    are you crazy
    you will then nerf prax
    and then vess
    and then make it to 40
    and people found smth to complain
    nerf mage and burn
    nerf soul reaper
    awesome!
    Last edited by ka tony s; 09-07-2017 at 03:17 PM.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    3
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    It's simply limiting the diversity of decks and making duels boring.

    120 deck is never stronger than 60 decks or 40 decks. it's the player's choice.

    please do not make this game boring

  8. #8
    Senior Member Veles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,328
    Tournaments Joined
    29
    Tournaments Won
    2
    What deck type is only possible to make with more than 60 cards that is not possible to make with 60 or less?

    What diversity are you talking about?

    An ally heavy 120 Boris is a midrange deck just as 40 cards Boris.
    A 120 cards Stallvox is a stall deck just as 60 cards stallvox.
    ...

    Design Team Leader

    Check out this thread for some awesome articles and guides.

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
    ― Nikola Tesla




  9. #9
    Devoted Fan Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    24,067
    Tournaments Joined
    1000
    Tournaments Won
    999
    Blog Entries
    1
    I feel like maybe we weren't clear enough about the meaning of "Quick Match". The only time you are going to get through a very large deck to the point where it matters that you had so many cards is if the game was not quick. Those non-quick games are the ones we wish to eliminate, especially as once you leave "quick" territory those games favour the player who went big.

    If you really intend to see and use all your cards in a huge deck, then you are not intending for a quick match. By all means take those giant decks into custom matches.

  10. #10
    Junior Member XY notlolicat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    16
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I don't think it is good.
    First,it will reduce decks diversity.I like SE because SE have so many funny decks not like HS only have Druid.
    Second,it can't let the game quickly than now. Account for most Undead or Homumcule's decks in rate and stall decks hardly any.
    Third,if max cards to 60,mill deck will be strong.All hope is lost will be the best card.
    Then you will nerf prax and other mill card.

    Here are my suggest:
    nerf 2cc 2atk4hp ally,it is too op.
    balance the upper hand and the defensive,same hand difference ending.
    Last edited by XY notlolicat; 09-07-2017 at 04:31 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •