For currently, the rating system is, at the beginning of each month, you win and gain much rating, you lose will drop little rating, so most players reach about 300 rating. But from middle of the month, If you are at 300 rating, you can hardly gain 1 rating when you win but very easy drop 2 rating if you lose. So it's very hard for people to keep their rating at a high level because he win 10 times, only get 5 rating, and lose 2 or 3 times will drop this 5 rating. This is very unfair! He get nothing then. This made the game a very ridiculous phenomenon --- the top rating players all play very little games in the season. If you have interest, please check the No.6 player, A1 Sir Prize, rating 350, this guy win 6 match and lose 3 match, and then he gain No.6 in Ranking! How ridiculous!
So do anybody think this game's rating system need to be change? What I think is, very simple, at beginning of each season, all players start at 0 rating and if he win a game, he gain only 1 rating, no matter his opponent's rating is high or low, and if he lose a game, he drop 1 rating, also no matter his opponent's rating is high or low. Because the game's system already assign the most nearby rating player as your opponent, so this is fair, You win, gain 1 rating, you lose, drop 1 rating. This change encourage people play more. If you are a high skill player, you play more, you win more, then your rating will be more higher. If you are a middle player, you play more, you can also get a no bad rating.
I know this change will made the rating not so shine (370 or even 400), but this is more truth, your rating reflect your true level. At least if you want gain 350 rating, you must play at least 350 games and all win I like this, don't like win 6 lose 3 and gain 350 rating, Ranking 6.
Guys what do you think?
Bookmarks