Close

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member InsanoMango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    279
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0

    General of Unaxio seeking no attachment crash

    Yoyo

    Unfortunately, this was figured out in a match against a guildmate of mine. It seems though that if you summon General of Unaxio and there is no attachment to seek, that the game will end in a draw.

    A1 InsanoMango Vs A1 HighThere you will see this happen. Same happened as well in my match vs DA Demongodfist. I didn't realize it there because I was half watching tv half playing.

    if this has been addressed already, my apologies.

  2. #2
    Senior Member phillipw123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    151
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    This also happened with my game today.

    RS PhillipW vs Prophet of Rage

  3. #3
    Director of Development Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    22,963
    Tournaments Joined
    13
    Tournaments Won
    1
    Blog Entries
    1
    OK, so the issue is that someone complained in the past that you should be able to view your deck even if there are no valid targets when General of Unaxio lets you seek. We added the capability to see your deck and then hit DONE when there were no options, but maybe actually that is causing sync errors in PVP. I tested against the AI and am surprised it has taken this long to come up as a bug. (Maybe it is actually OK but was broken by recent GUI changes in 3.17. I don't know.) We can easily turn off that capability for the sake of not crashing.

    I've logged this in our bug tracking system for Kyle to tackle, since I no longer do coding with the game.
    Last edited by Gondorian; 04-25-2017 at 07:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Member AHSAN022's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    India
    Posts
    66
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    It is correct
    I found it in 3 games
    First one fighter123
    A1 Umbabarauma
    Last one i dont remember

  5. #5
    Chat Mod Umbra7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Arizona, USA. (Gmt -7)
    Posts
    875
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Gondorian View Post

    I've logged this in our bug tracking system for Kyle to tackle, since I no longer do coding with the game.
    Just want to draw attention to this bit of text right here? Specifically the "I no longer do coding with the game" portion. Did nobody else catch onto that and, you know, ask questions?
    Shadow of the Night
    Warrior of The Blue Phoenix
    Greatness, Reborn

    Seeker of potential, hidden from the light
    Teacher from the darkness, the Shadow of The Night
    To you I bring my knowledge, hidden from plain sight
    And write it in my blog, bringing new things to the fight


    IGN: BP Umbra Nox

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    31
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    6 months later and this bug still hasn't been fixed.

    Having to play against a Jericho stall deck for 30 minutes, only to end up with a draw because my opponent exploits a bug knowing that he is about to lose is the nail to the coffin for me.

    I know this post has as little value as the next one, but please get the priorities right. Bugs like these should take priority over a new rating system or a weird 120 -> 80 card deck change.

  7. #7
    Director of Development Gondorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England (GMT+0)
    Posts
    22,963
    Tournaments Joined
    13
    Tournaments Won
    1
    Blog Entries
    1

    General of Unaxio seeking no attachment crash

    Quote Originally Posted by AmPsy View Post
    6 months later and this bug still hasn't been fixed.

    Having to play against a Jericho stall deck for 30 minutes, only to end up with a draw because my opponent exploits a bug knowing that he is about to lose is the nail to the coffin for me.

    I know this post has as little value as the next one, but please get the priorities right. Bugs like these should take priority over a new rating system or a weird 120 -> 80 card deck change.
    Hi. I agree bugs like this should be prioritised for fixing so I got it fixed for 3.51 once I become a coder on the game again. I implemented the new rating system and deck size change while others have been finishing other aspects of 3.51, so I think we're aligned on priorities completely.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •