Just played a game against a loest. Very nice control deck and i cpuldnt get a leg up. He hardly used any burn and just controlled me the whole way. Almost like a priest would. It showed an excellent well thought out strategy.
There has been talk about mages are for "noobs". This is not true.
First of all the word noob is insulting. Lets call them new players from now on please.
Throughtout the history of this game there have been 3 main decks. Rush mid range and control with various aspects and degrees between them. None of them are "noob". I can beat a "noob" rush just as well as a "noob" rush can beat me. Its all about matchups, strategy and a little luck.
When zalashard was running all over the place and everyone was screaming he is op i would win 8 out of 10 matches agaisnt him with victor. 4 brax soldiers. Easy. Shut him down cold.
So in the future can we please not call these deck noob deck. Perhaps a rush mage is a little more forgiving to a new player. But just because you can get it to 300 doesnt mean its a noob deck. Its well built. Ive seen many many rush mages totally fall in thier face flat and useless.
Its about being polite to new players and keeping the game civil. Loest, eledawen and majiya can have very succesful mid range and light control decks as well. The loest that beat me used one fireball one lithning and one nova. Hardly burned me down.
People that read this forum donsonin an effort to improve thier game and get better. Not tomhave passive aggressive insults slung at them. Thanks.
Bookmarks