I know it's still early, but what are people's senses of the current hero tiers?
Tier 1 - Always competitive
-These are heroes that are adaptable to any meta or setting. They may have weak matchups but will have very few auto-losses in well constructed decks. The classic example is Zaladar - in prior releases you could make Zaladar competitive in nearly any meta.
Tier 2 - Competitive most of the time
-These are heroes that are generally solid, they may do very well in the right meta, but will have enough bad matchups or auto-losses that they are difficult to count on in all settings. An example from SF is Threbin, who was very good with certain matchups, but less consistent than most tier 1 heroes.
Tier 3 - Can be competitive
-These heroes can be good, but require specific meta-games to perform consistently. Logan is a good example of this, as he has often struggled in quick match, but has been used through SF to win tournaments.
Tier 4 - Not competitive
-These heroes have too many bad matchups to do well consistently. They're not necessarily hopeless, but just have enough weak matchups that you wouldn't really count on them to win you a game. If you're winning tournaments with these heroes or rated above 300 in quick match, people should be impressed. I good example from SF might be Ter Adun.
Bookmarks