I agree with some of your points and your argument in general, but some things in there are simply not correct.
Yes you are right Twilight is so dominate because it has everything it needs and removing just one or two of those things makes everything else less potent. Most obvious example is all the draw in the world won't help if your entire deck only contains garbage recursion is again only strong if you have things worth using it on.
That being said, Twilights had a lot of cards that were simply beyond insane and to say they were never viable above 270 rating is also not quite accurate when Twilight
Aramia was the 2nd most dominate deck in SF QM (as a whole I will grant the tribe was weak because there really weren't any other T1 twilight decks to my knowledge).
Ritualist people complained about back in SF. Going first it gives insane removal power.
Luminary was also really broken and looks like it is still strong even if for a very different reason than before. Good stats + Seek is not in anyway a dead card.
Scriptures was by far the best draw engine in the game. Not sure about its strength now it might still need some work looks like it might actually be a bit weak.
The Location was also fairly broken imo. Unfortunately I think they went overboard on this one.
Avatar I actually fully agree with you. The power behind this card relies on the strength of what it was able to bring back, nerfing all those things makes Avatar far more reasonable. Probably still a bit too good, but likely not good enough to justify the amount of nerfing it got.
Kallista change looks like a buff to me, and I'm assuming was mainly done to give Twilight a 5 drop now that Avatar no longer fills that slot.
Bookmarks