Preview of Balance Changes for 3.12

[Anonymos]

But it's a t5 location?

it is t5 which makes it even weaker

[Fionn Maccumhail]

Nerf to the Wulven, Sosilo and exaltation are all really bad choices IMO. I've only seen one deck running the Wulven and I was the one running it. Ditto for thaddeus' vault, ditto for ravenscrest. These things were so OP that no-one was playing them? Sosilo was a reasonable but not OP location and is now unplayable. Basically the new location mechanic has been nerfed to unusability.

Change to exaltation seems entirely inappropriate tbh.

Also, has anyone used raksul at all ever?

Twilight nerf was needed. Garina nerf might render it non-existent.

[Nu Lyfe]

it is t5 which makes it even weaker

I know the question mark was more so for the fact that dej said it'll be useful on t4

[phillipw123]

The change to Garina road is too much. I can’t see this card getting any play with these changes.
Would have been balanced if the activation cost was just increased to 4cc. A card has to provide some benefit to the user to justify its inclusion in the deck. The changes make the opposing ability is better than the main one.

[phillipw123]

Lorhon: Twilight Encampment
- Controller activation cost up to 1SE (from 0SE).
- Non-controller ability changed to "0SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, all friendly allies gain +1 health and this location is exiled." (from "1SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, shuffle this location into its owner's deck.").


I agree with the player activation cost increase from 0SE to 1SE but the non-controller ability change would make the location non useable. I think this change would have been fairer.

Non-controller ability changed to "0SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, this location is exiled."

The +1 health to all friendly allies is too much.

[The MiddleAgedNerd]

Love garina and twilight. +1. Forgotte horror and general +1. The rest i havent used much. See. Great developers that listen. Thanks gondorian

[The MiddleAgedNerd]

The change to Garina road is too much. I can’t see this card getting any play with these changes.
Would have been balanced if the activation cost was just increased to 4cc. A card has to provide some benefit to the user to justify its inclusion in the deck. The changes make the opposing ability is better than the main one.

Much better. It was way to strong
Way way to strong. Thisnis way better.

[jacqui]

Lorhon: Twilight Encampment
- Controller activation cost up to 1SE (from 0SE).
- Non-controller ability changed to "0SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, all friendly allies gain +1 health and this location is exiled." (from "1SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, shuffle this location into its owner's deck.").


I agree with the player activation cost increase from 0SE to 1SE but the non-controller ability change would make the location non useable. I think this change would have been fairer.

Non-controller ability changed to "0SE: If an opposing Twilight ally was killed this turn, this location is exiled."

The +1 health to all friendly allies is too much.

This card is dead. Non controller side is better than the controller side, which isn't even that good to begin with.

[phillipw123]

Much better. It was way to strong
Way way to strong. Thisnis way better.

Why would you want to use this card at all now. The non-controller side is now better than the controller side.

I think you would see more people complaining if the abilities on Garina road were flipped around.

[G.P]

Rip Twilight 2016 - 2016