Relentless savagery is op

[G.P]

Relentless Savagery is a powerful card , but doesn't need a nerf , at least for now

- It's the only thing holding the claw themed together, gives a reason to play all claw damage guys in the deck . Maybe when next part of LL comes out with a bunch of card that scream " claw attack " in their text, RS might need some changes .

- Attachments have been crappy for a very long time . Having a good attachment in the game encourage people to try new type of decks .

The first part of LL comes out with only 67 cards but has already had a considerable impact on the meta and the game on the whole . That's what makes this expansion better than the previous ones .

[mindy]

I think you misused the word literally. Vess is one hero that uses it, but Ive seen a shadow hero from almost every class using it. And not even just wulven decks that use the location. Nerfing it to 3cc WILL kill the card for anything that isnt vess or a lakmir deck. Personally i have a banebow that uses it (i think I'll call it clawbow) and as i think i mentioned in this thread, the deck works great. However it isnt this attachment that even makes the deck. While the attachment is great, I dont lose just because i didnt draw it, or because somebody used retreat and i lost my savagery. Its a balanced tool that the deck uses when it needs to. Just like every single other card in that banebow deck. I'll hold onto savagery for when i need it, just like i do with my soul seekers. Just like i do with krygon. If it were an "OP" card that i built a deck around, then i dont think id be able to keep it in my hand for so long before actually playing it.

no i have literally never seen any other hero use it. not even wulven elementalis. if you are going to play with attachments than no hero does it better than vess so thats why only vess uses it. and if people would try other heroes they fast realize vess is the best option for this card. which is probably why i have never seen other heroes use it. but that is irrelevant because this card is not balanced for just 2 cost.

[Arcanes]

no i have literally never seen any other hero use it. not even wulven elementalis. if you are going to play with attachments than no hero does it better than vess so thats why only vess uses it. and if people would try other heroes they fast realize vess is the best option for this card. which is probably why i have never seen other heroes use it. but that is irrelevant because this card is not balanced for just 2 cost.

You need read THIS post. Before you solve your arguments only based on the decks you've just face mindi.

[The MiddleAgedNerd]

You need read THIS post. Before you solve your arguments only based on the decks you've just face mindi.

Thanks.

[Caitlyn0]

no i have literally never seen any other hero use it. not even wulven elementalis. if you are going to play with attachments than no hero does it better than vess so thats why only vess uses it. and if people would try other heroes they fast realize vess is the best option for this card. which is probably why i have never seen other heroes use it. but that is irrelevant because this card is not balanced for just 2 cost.

huh. your logic has always astounded me. i didnt think it could anymore. but wow. just wow.

but ... using your logic, how do you see it as not balanced? or are you saying it is under-balanced since it is only good in vess?

[Umbra7]

no i have literally never seen any other hero use it. not even wulven elementalis. if you are going to play with attachments than no hero does it better than vess so thats why only vess uses it. and if people would try other heroes they fast realize vess is the best option for this card. which is probably why i have never seen other heroes use it. but that is irrelevant because this card is not balanced for just 2 cost.

I see, fair enough i guess. Using generalising terms based on your own experience. Cause THATS never done the world harm.

Vess hasnt been the best option for me. I've had a LOT better results with my banebow, while the vess deck ive used has lost every time. (granted, some of those losses were just bad luck. I still dont understand how i lost to an 80 card priest that had 0 board the whole game, and only dealt 2 damage to my hero.) if you dont like to use it outside of vess, thats fine. But that doesnt mean vess is the best option. As with many other attachments, id rather use bloodthristy with wulves or elementalis than with vess. (wulves are fun with that and death from above. And now it works great with lakmire, but...now on later turns.)

[qaz92zaq]

Vess is the only one that might use it AFTER a nerf but i am even 50/50 on that fence. its pretty decent in moonstalker, elementalis, specific ravager decks using mostly claw ravagers as it is now. but again, only if the deck is at least 75%+ claw allies. less than that and you shouldnt add this card to the deck pretty much by the percentage of non claw allies. so lets say, you ratio is 50/50 claw/non claw... then relentless savagery is 50% effective... and that wouldnt be good.

i am sure people are gonna argue that as well. but oh well, maybe everyone is ignoring me now.

I don't think people disagree that the card is only good if the majority of your allies (especially the low cost ones) have claw attacks. Just that it is such an easy condition to fulfill your ally pools does not feel lacking.

[mindy]

when i say i havent seen it being used by another hero i meant in quick matches. not playing with your clan members. or some competition. when discussing card balances i dont care about anything other than what is going in the public meta. not private meta environments. you can say that other heroes use it but seeing it once or twice or referring to a bad deck using it is not worth discussing.

[Lightning Fury]

not private meta environments

This sounds so nostalgic lol.

[Caitlyn0]

when i say i havent seen it being used by another hero i meant in quick matches. not playing with your clan members. or some competition. when discussing card balances i dont care about anything other than what is going in the public meta. not private meta environments. you can say that other heroes use it but seeing it once or twice or referring to a bad deck using it is not worth discussing.

you are so funny. private meta environments. you sound like an RS member when talking about me. no offense RS. when i talk about a card, i talk about the whole game, including QM, including a vast amount of players as well outside of my guild. i play games, i watch games, i dont just take my own experiences into account at whatever rating i am at. unlike you. i just cannot see how you think it is OP when according to you, only vess uses it properly because vess can make it cost nothing to cast. sounds more like a problem with vess, from your point of view and not this card. cause outside of vess, it sucks, according to you. your whole argument about this card says its not OP.

this was the problem the DT had with Aramia, they kept nerfing cards she used, cause everyone was calling that aramia deck OP and in the process, took them right out of the game for everyone.