Max Card decks please?

[Lahiri]

The only problem I have with huge decks like that is that it slows the game to a crawl a lot of the time. I don't really mind it for the gameplay strategy though, if my opponent has so many cards they are less likely to draw what they need.

This.
I'd limit the deck size to something like 150-200 only to avoid performance issues, but I don't see any need to limit card number for gameplay reasons

[Flamebringer]

The only problem I have with huge decks like that is that it slows the game to a crawl a lot of the time. I don't really mind it for the gameplay strategy though, if my opponent has so many cards they are less likely to draw what they need.

Agreed. Gameplay wise I don't care. Performance-wise, it can get a little slow facing the really massive decks.

[oggtheman]

Agreed. Gameplay wise I don't care. Performance-wise, it can get a little slow facing the really massive decks.

Like my 700 card one?

[Kip thorp]

The bigger the better I've heard some say.

But the worst is losing to a tower deck just magically gets every card they need! That's the problem!

[chanson311]

70 should be MAX- period

More cards in a deck = less consistent results - period

Occasionally you will lose to a 300 card deck, but you should be thinking free win when you see a deck over 60 cards.

[Leviosablade]

More cards in a deck = less consistent results - period

Occasionally you will lose to a 300 card deck, but you should be thinking free win when you see a deck over 60 cards.

That's what I think