Mugged! [Rogue Ability se109]

**glenn3e** · 05-10-2011, 06:56 AM

Originally Posted by Hednez

If you take a look at my other cards, you'd see a second trap. I mean, sure, that means only 2 traps, but what about the future? 10? Maybe 15 traps would be pretty nice, i think.
But if SE only wants the Hunter class to have traps, I wouldn't blame them. Maybe one (or more

) of my other cards'll be chosen. We'll see...

I stand corrected, but the point is, I'd rather only one class had traps else it takes away some of the uniqueness of the class. If your card idea goes to a new Hunter card, that be awesome. Combined with a cheaper Surprise Attack

, it'll be a lot more interesting for the Hunter class in the future to suddenly throw out a few traps in a turn.

**Hednez** · 05-10-2011, 07:00 AM

Originally Posted by glenn3e

I stand corrected, but the point is, I'd rather only one class had traps else it takes away some of the uniqueness of the class. If your card idea goes to a new Hunter card, that be awesome. Combined with a cheaper Surprise Attack

, it'll be a lot more interesting for the Hunter class in the future to suddenly throw out a few traps in a turn.

K, then I'm going to write a note beside my traps.
Think you got a good point here.

EDIT: Added an alternative card just for you!

**Leviathana010** · 05-10-2011, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by Hednez

Umm...(*blush*) thanks for your support!

Btw, have you seen the other cards I created? ^_^

Yeah, great work...
Some of your creations are very well constructed.

**Hednez** · 05-10-2011, 09:07 AM

Originally Posted by Leviathana010

Yeah, great work...
Some of your creations are very well constructed.

Thanks, again!

Btw, I kinda like the idea in your signature:

LEVIATHANa, cost 10: Cannot attack unless you sacrifice 2 resources. 10/10

But make him cost 9 again

**Leviathana010** · 05-10-2011, 09:09 AM

Btw, I think it's a nice idea to have rogues use traps as well. We all know hunters use them but as for rogues in (eg.) RPGs, they are masters of trapping and snaring targets...

My opinion would be to have both classes use these constructions but make it class-bound.
Like "trap" cards for hunters and "snare" cards for rogues...

**Leviathana010** · 05-10-2011, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by Hednez

Thanks, again!

Btw, I kinda like the idea in your signature:

But make him cost 9 again

Cost 10 suits my screen-name better... And it's a SHE...

(original idea is the Leviathan from MtG© ofcourse which has cost 9)

Too bad the best suiting artwork is already used by "Here be monsters"

**Hednez** · 05-10-2011, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by Leviathana010

Cost 10 suits my screen-name better... And it's a SHE...

(original idea is the Leviathan from MtG© ofcourse which has cost 9)

Too bad the best suiting artwork is already used by "Here be monsters"

Haha, I know that card! Pretty senseless to play in MTG. But I think it'd be a nice addition to SE!

**Kalland** · 05-11-2011, 12:04 AM

Name: Bludgeon
Casting cost: 3
Effect: Target Ally is stunned for three turns.
Flavor: "You might need stitches for that..."

**Kaylie** · 05-11-2011, 09:55 AM

Name: Stay hungry
Type: Trap
Cost: 3
Effect: this card is played face down. When opponent hero heals, deals damage equivalent to amount healed plus 2.
Text: that's what you get when you don't share!

This will put soul reaper at bay! Right now we dont have any way to keep elementals from healing from 9 to 28 in one turn.