Bloodpack Shaman Nerf poll

[Rivozzz]

Thought since Dev team are trying to balance unbalanced cards by listening to the community,them let's hear the community idea about bloodpack shaman

What so you think about this card

1- it is good as it is
2- it needs a nerf, a higher cost
3- it needs a nerf, it should return a random 3cc or less ally from graveyard
4- it needs a nerf, its attack status should be lower
5- it needs a nerf, by make a end to the endless looping or adding counters before SF becomes live
6- it needs a nerf, other than those posted above

Let's hear what the community think about this card.

[Zhou86]

Voted.

[Ness]

6 - it should not be able to return other bloodpack shamans

[Theonecabs]

Voted

[Ganjamus]

Should only affect the top ally in the graveyard like a mini Gravebone. Easier to manipulate for the opponent.

[Karlos4]

Should only affect the top ally in the graveyard like a mini Gravebone. Easier to manipulate for the opponent.

U mean a mini Shadow Knight, right?
I think it returning the top 3cc or below wulven ally is good, tatget wulven ally a bit too strong (current state).

[Preybird]

Definitely return top ally, or return target 3cc ally only, but then you can't loop them at all.

[ADVA]

6 - it should not be able to return other bloodpack shamans

[ShrapnelFox]

I think it returning the top 3cc or below wulven ally is good, tatget wulven ally a bit too strong (current state).

Agreed. The stats should be kept the same and allow the 'looping', however the 'choosing' of the 3 cost ally to return is too much.
The choosing prevents any way of breaking the loop without having specific cards to exile allies. (very cards have the power to exile and those that do are often allies that must be in play and readied - to allow exiling)
If the wording was 'returns the top 3 cost or less ally' the loop could be disrupted with a bit of skill - while also allowing a skilled player to still utilize the looping.

I'd keep away from 'returns a random' ally, as this introduces unnecessary 'luck' which makes using the card less practical. (One of the great features of SE is the fact that the 'luck' component is minimized and the game outcome is more based on skill)

[gnodab]

Agreed. The stats should be kept the same and allow the 'looping', however the 'choosing' of the 3 cost ally to return is too much.
The choosing prevents any way of breaking the loop without having specific cards to exile allies. (very cards have the power to exile and those that do are often allies that must be in play and readied - to allow exiling)
If the wording was 'returns the top 3 cost or less ally' the loop could be disrupted with a bit of skill - while also allowing a skilled player to still utilize the looping.

I'd keep away from 'returns a random' ally, as this introduces unnecessary 'luck' which makes using the card less practical. (One of the great features of SE is the fact that the 'luck' component is minimized and the game outcome is more based on skill)

sounds good