nerf ravens gambit

[Airact]

no i wouldn't.

airacts rating for example has risen from 194 to 261 in 1 day.

How does that matter?

I'm not a good player (if you are even implying that, I hope not). You don't have to be good in order to play on "high" rating levels.

[thecatch]

So people who won big tournaments, and were highly rated few seasons ago(when rating actually had meaning) but now don't feel like grinding relentlessly suddenly lost all their credibility?

1) don't insinuate.
2) rating still has meaning.
3) you need to grind for score, not rating (i'd say it takes 5-10 games to get over 250 if you are worth it).

[thecatch]

You don't have to be good in order to play on "high" rating levels.

i disagree. it really doesn´t make sense. i hope you mean score.

[Veles]

I know I am gonna regret this.

What did I insinuate? I asked a simple question you did not give answer to. You are basically being highly disrespectful to people who have immense game experience, and have achieved far greater things in this game than simple high rating. Any player with with average playing experience can take some rush hero first day of rating reset and go as high as 300.

[WrathOfCroft]

I know I am gonna regret this.

What did I insinuate? I asked a simple question you did not give answer to. You are basically being highly disrespectful to people who have immense game experience, and have achieved far greater things in this game than simple high rating. Any player with with average playing experience can take some rush hero first day of rating reset and go as high as 300.

^ THIS

its not that rating doesnt matter, i mean if you played vs. a 340 rated player, you wouldnt want to make mistakes. Buy likewise you shouldnt disregard a player who is atm 250 unless you know for sure that they arent that skilled. With rating reseting every month now its easier to get to and above 300 and if u dont play every day, its easy to stay below 300 for the entire season. So although it can be used as a general indication of a players skill, its by no means the end all measurement on a player.

but that was just another troll post so ill stop now

[pjoe0211]

^ THIS

its not that rating doesnt matter, i mean if you played vs. a 340 rated player, you wouldnt want to make mistakes. Buy likewise you shouldnt disregard a player who is atm 250 unless you know for sure that they arent that skilled. With rating reseting every month now its easier to get to and above 300 and if u dont play every day, its easy to stay below 300 for the entire season. So although it can be used as a general indication of a players skill, its by no means the end all measurement on a player.

but that was just another troll post so ill stop now

i feel like someone who peaks at 250 really doesnt know what they are doing too well or is using an under powered hero and is only of average skill, pretty much 280 is the spot when you can at least trust that people have a good understanding of what they are doing, especially late in the season

[thecatch]

i feel like someone who peaks at 250 really doesnt know what they are doing too well or is using an under powered hero and is only of average skill, pretty much 280 is the spot when you can at least trust that people have a good understanding of what they are doing, especially late in the season

agreed.

[Daemon Rayge]

the opinion of high level players on game balance means something while the opinion of low ranked players indeed has 0 value to me.

There are plenty of highly respected and knowledgable players who have lower ratings because they have not played much during a Season. Just because they have not played recently doesn't make them bad.

Also, you made zero argument over why it should be nerfed. You have provided no grounds for any discussion or any form of evidence in why it is OP. Simply stating "I lost to this card, please nerf" is kind of signaling a bad player IMHO.

It is indeed strong, yes. But OP, not really. Maybe borderline in Victor, but Victor kind of needed it to start shining.

[thecatch]

There are plenty of highly respected and knowledgable players who have lower ratings because they have not played much during a Season. Just because they have not played recently doesn't make them bad.

Simply stating "I lost to this card, please nerf" is kind of signaling a bad player IMHO.

i have never said either.

stop spreading false information. next time i report you.

[Twio]

Hahaha reported for spreading false information, top lel.

Gambit is OP as hell but since Victor is the one being made OP I really couldn't care less, he deserves it.

I also don't see it getting any stronger in future sets so I don't see any need to nerf it.

EDIT: If we keep pestering the DT to make good cards to buff the weak heroes, and then cry OP when they do, what kind of message does that send?