As already said some days ago, imo most of new card art are really badly framed, and it is a waste because some images are very cool.
I give you some little example and i wish know your opinion about that, telling me if i m wrong!
Here some example...on the left side there is the ORIGINAL card, on the right my version "re-framed"....
IMO the difference is not negligible...
Last edited by Riccardo; 06-20-2014 at 02:11 PM.
+1
But why don't they frame it correctly in the first place?
EVOLVING THROUGH COMPANIONSHIP
Honored to be a part of ETC guild family
IGN: ETC Angel White
"Answers are the only thing worth seeking."
-Aramia
"We are all just consumers, consuming Shadow Era products."
-angel white
I dont know....and those are only some examples.....there are many others....
I completely agree on these. I hope someone sends this to Kyle. You could pm him as well.
Retired Card Game Designer
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments.
The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
― Nikola Tesla
I disagree. Original ones made them look taller
Buried Treasure of Nanana
Warrior of the Blue Phoenix/ Greatness, Reborn
My tournament achievements
No, they are a little bit taller because all the card is taller then mine!....dont you see the dimension differences!Originally Posted by Index
Agreed.
Lythian Sledgehammer's art should be flipped horizontally as part of the hammer is currently hidden by the warrior\wulven class icons.
Sure!i just made some example! They made a very roughly work...Agreed.
Lythian Sledgehammer
I dunno, I think centering all the art looks incredibly boring and stale. The original framing is much more dynamic.
I don't think the framing on the new cards is an issue. Though I feel the overall quality and consistency of the new art (esp. the poor shadow heroes) is really problematic.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks