Necromancer's Shroud need errata?

[udy]

Necromancer's Shroud (3cc - 3/1) 2D: Target Undead ally in your graveyard with cost 3 or less is returned to play readied, with 1 health, and killed at the end of the turn.

I read many post about we can keep the ally on the board by removing the armor after used its ability (I never tried this on my own).

IMO, If it really mean that way, I think it need an errata:
2D: Target Undead ally in your graveyard with cost 3 or less is returned to play readied, with 1 health. At the end of any turn, any ally revived by this card's first ability is killed.

With its existing wording, the game would remember the ability as a whole, and still kill the ally at the end of the turn even if the armor is destroyed.

is it?

[Jo3yb0i]

I believe the current wording is the actual intention of the card. Making combos that synergize and override this loophole is the perfect for theorycrafters. It is a strategy that can be fairly useful and strong.

P.S. Yes if the armor is not on the board then the ally stays on the board

[ocnarb]

Is intended, and your wording would still make it work the same way. A card can only resolve if it is in play, so if the armor is destroyed the active cant kick in

[udy]

I believe the current wording is the actual intention of the card. Making combos that synergize and override this loophole is the perfect for theorycrafters. It is a strategy that can be fairly useful and strong.

P.S. Yes if the armor is not on the board then the ally stays on the board

Is intended, and your wording would still make it work the same way. A card can only resolve if it is in play, so if the armor is destroyed the active cant kick in

So is there no instant effect that was memorize by the game in SE? that still trigger even after the resource of the effect doesnt exist anymore in the game?

I havent found other perfect example, but isnt Jasmine Ability would be an example about instant effect ive mentioned above? Or Jasmine ability is counted as "status"? like disabled status from an Anklebreaker?

[ocnarb]

You are right

Cant attack, cant defend, disabled and frozen are negative status and continue even if the source is gone

[udy]

You are right

Cant attack, cant defend, disabled and frozen are negative status and continue even if the source is gone

ah ok i see thanks for the explanation.

so there no ability effect that still remembered by the game after the source left, except for negative/positive status.

[Gondorian]

ah ok i see thanks for the explanation.

so there no ability effect that still remembered by the game after the source left, except for negative/positive status.

That's correct, so long as you remember that permanent stat changes (e.g. "gains +2 health", "is reduced by 2 health") are effects that resolve immediately and so it doesn't matter what happens to their source after that.

[udy]

That's correct, so long as you remember that permanent stat changes (e.g. "gains +2 health", "is reduced by 2 health") are effects that resolve immediately and so it doesn't matter what happens to their source after that.

(Just found this. I hope the real writer of this question dont mind I rewrite it here )
If my Bone Sabre left with 1 durability and I have an SK on board, and I hit the opposing ally and lost my Bone Sabre in the process, will my SK attack that ally?

If the answer is yes, then its agains my previous statement u have approved.
If the answer is not. well, someone was wrong claimed its as bug

[Twio]

(Just found this. I hope the real writer of this question dont mind I rewrite it here )
If my Bone Sabre left with 1 durability and I have an SK on board, and I hit the opposing ally and lost my Bone Sabre in the process, will my SK attack that ally?

If the answer is yes, then its agains my previous statement u have approved.
If the answer is not. well, someone was wrong claimed its as bug

SK won't attack