Nathanias, The People's Champion

[Ninetails]

For a 7cc ally this card does offer much of a reason to use it. Expensive armors and weapons can be worth the cost, due to their instant use or effect on the battlefield. Therefore, to make this guy worth his cost, consider making the summoned ally also readied. If needed, tweak Nathanias' health and attack to compensate for the power increase.

[Yvan Antoine]

I don't think it's that strong but can be good in an ally heavy deck. I'm trying with portal and so far no luck. I got it probably by luck In a tala deck twice in a row. If the effects procs it's pretty strong. The only problem at best your around 50% chance it procs. It would be nice if it always worked or if you got to draw 2 cards but they go back if they're not allies shuffled in.

Although getting an ally every time might be too strong.

[TripleHBK]

I for one dislike this ally (and for the name he bears he should really be the most electrifying in the whole ally cardpool today), but giving it haste only because he's a (7) ally would be too much imo.
Probably a different ability would do the trick. Dunno which one though.

[luminosg]

He seems like the quintessential Timmy card. Big stat block with the potential to bring out another big stat block out for free. I'm okay with him actually not being good.

[TripleHBK]

He's a (7) ally and he's the people champion, for god's sake. How can he not be good?

[Daemon Rayge]

He's a (7) ally and he's the people champion, for god's sake. How can he not be good?

They cannot smell what he is cooking.

[TripleHBK]

They cannot smell what he is cooking.

Ahah exactly!!

[Ninetails]

I for one dislike this ally (and for the name he bears he should really be the most electrifying in the whole ally cardpool today), but giving it haste only because he's a (7) ally would be too much imo.
Probably a different ability would do the trick. Dunno which one though.

I did't mean to imply that Nathanias should get haste, but rather for the ally that he puts (if it triggers) into play to get it.

[TripleHBK]

I did't mean to imply that Nathanias should get haste, but rather for the ally that he puts (if it triggers) into play to get it.

Oh, ok.
Sorry, I misread your post.

[Twio]

I did't mean to imply that Nathanias should get haste, but rather for the ally that he puts (if it triggers) into play to get it.

"I didn't mean to impl-" "IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU MEANT TO IMPLY JABRONI!"