Shattered Fates Spoilers 9

[Shadow Mann]

I think this was supposed to be spoiler #8 and the other I posted #9, but it seems this was overlooked as well (when/if these two spoiler threads get started in the dev blog, the comments listed under these can be moved there and then my two threads can be deleted).

[planarbox]

Honestly, this looks incredibly promising to make an attachment jhericho more viable (or any attachment deck really). Zalien Crusader + divine connection means attachments are virtually free and with Irina you can slap just about any of the +2 attachments on her and end up with someone who can deal 8-16 damage a turn by turn 5.

[Rivozzz]

Actually I think it a good Lance ally

Turn 3 Aldon ( doubt he will survive till the combo)
Turn 4 Zailen crusader
Turn 5 Hasted Irina + Treasured Heirloom (Zalien Effect) or Turn 6 Hasted Irina + A Legend Rises (Zailen effect)

For warrior and Priest:
Irina is a beast after Kings Pride, if not dealt with it

For hunters:
1) Irina is great after Surprise Attack to draw 2 cards per turn
2)It would be so funny if you have a hunter equipped with Rapid Fire, attacking twice and An Irina attacking Twice

[planarbox]

Actually I think it a good Lance ally

Turn 3 Aldon ( doubt he will survive till the combo)
Turn 4 Zailen crusader
Turn 5 Hasted Irina + Treasured Heirloom (Zalien Effect) or Turn 6 Hasted Irina + A Legend Rises (Zailen effect)

Agreed, lances haste ability would be fantastic with her.

With Jhericho you can do

2 - Divine Connection
3 - Zalien
4 - Irina + attachment
5 - 2 more attachments and attack

if you hit a perfect hand you can get sacred fire walker, inner strenght, an a hero rises by turn 5

16 damage on turn 5
16 damage on turn 6

game over

[Rivozzz]

Agree, Unless there is retreat (

I edited my above both and added how it would be nice to hunters as drawing engine and to priests and warrior for kings pride

Actually Irina can do fine after Aldon, Doesn't need much attachments or Zailen, but for sure if they are there, they will be a beast

[ill_dawg]

shouldn't it be 2 fewer resources, since resources are countable?

[QuantumNinja]

Zalien Crusader + Crippling Blow

OR

Zalien Crusader + Consuming Fear

are pretty strong turn 3 plays when going second, assuming your opponent put down an ally or two.

[Mightyoak713]

Shouldn't we have a keyword for attacking twice?

[Mightyoak713]

shouldn't it be 2 fewer resources, since resources are countable?

I don't think so. Being 2 less res is good for if you had an attachment cc of 3 then reading her ability would let you know it only costs one res to play. Because its 2 less than the cc of the card you wanna play

[QuantumNinja]

I don't think so. Being 2 less res is good for if you had an attachment cc of 3 then reading her ability would let you know it only costs one res to play. Because its 2 less than the cc of the card you wanna play

He's getting at a grammatical issue. Technically, it should be "2 fewer resources" instead of "2 less resources", if you want to follow "proper" English usage.

It's the same reason why people like to make a fuss about how the "12 items or less" lane at the grocery store should be "12 items or fewer."

Personally, I think it's fine the way it is, and it's consistent with the language on currently released cards.