Close

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: Banebow 2.0

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0

    Banebow 2.0

    Well i started playing with MS and reached a rating of 280 and bought banebow and decided to make a banebow deck...
    Checked the forums but didn'd find any new(2.0) banebow decks so tried to make my own and struggling to make it hope the experienced banebow players might help me out.
    So here is my deck

    1 X Banebow

    Allies

    4 X Iron Hide Karash
    3 X Infernal Gargoyle
    3 X Death Mage Thaddus
    4 X Bad Wolf
    3 X Shadow Knight
    3 X Plasma Behemoth

    Abilities

    2 X Poison Arrow
    2 X Fire Arrow
    2 X Shriek Of Vengence
    2 X Acid jet
    4 X Perfect Shot

    Armor

    4 X Wrath Of The Forest

    Equipment

    4 X Soul Seeker

    Any tips, suggestions are welcome....

  2. #2
    1.27 Tournament Champion Raphael Majere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,585
    Tournaments Joined
    4
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    6
    The core is good but you definitely need more draw. (Bs, sac lab, bloodthirsty, tracker)

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    23
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Been running a similar deck, like many banebows out there...
    Found my Furrion Terrors to be very useful (e.g. 3 instead of your 3 Plasma B)
    Also 4 poison arrows and no flame arrows, as the disable is generally quite welcome

  4. #4
    1.27 Tournament Champion Raphael Majere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,585
    Tournaments Joined
    4
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    6
    flame arrows does take down gargs beautifully.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    5tumbl : As for furion terror i am confused b/w kairos and furion terror as i find it very situational as my deck is ally based on allies so the chances of FT helping me is very minimal.... thats the reason i didn't add either yet depending on the suggestions will decide which to buy for my deck...

    I agree with RAphael i found flaming arrow more useful with banebow than the poison arrow... poison arrow is the best for victor not for banebow.. atleast from my point of view.... And for draw the oly good cards i found were 4 X WOTF and 2 X SAC lamb

    i would even like to add that i am not able to maintain board control at all when playing against MS and Elementalist i know they are my bad match ups but not winning even a single match against them is very insulting.

  6. #6
    1.27 Tournament Champion Raphael Majere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,585
    Tournaments Joined
    4
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by KoKuJo View Post
    5tumbl : As for furion terror i am confused b/w kairos and furion terror as i find it very situational as my deck is ally based on allies so the chances of FT helping me is very minimal.... thats the reason i didn't add either yet depending on the suggestions will decide which to buy for my deck...

    I agree with RAphael i found flaming arrow more useful with banebow than the poison arrow... poison arrow is the best for victor not for banebow.. atleast from my point of view.... And for draw the oly good cards i found were 4 X WOTF and 2 X SAC lamb

    i would even like to add that i am not able to maintain board control at all when playing against MS and Elementalist i know they are my bad match ups but not winning even a single match against them is very insulting.
    you shouldn't have an issue with MS with your bb blast,PB, and ally control cards and dmt.

    if u do, it's due to the missing 2 sac lambs

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Raphael so you suggest that adding two sac lambs will be enough for the deck? no other change is required?

  8. #8
    1.27 Tournament Champion Raphael Majere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,585
    Tournaments Joined
    4
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by KoKuJo View Post
    Raphael so you suggest that adding two sac lambs will be enough for the deck? no other change is required?
    Do me a favor, how many cards is your deck currently?

    I suggest removing 2 tps and adding 2 sac lamb.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    i think there is a lot of room for improvisation in the creatures part as well. If i can get a proper set of allies then playing against an elementalist would also not be an issue.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    my deck size is 41 and i added the 2 sac lambs asa u suggested...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •