Close

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member painful_smile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,178
    Tournaments Joined
    3
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    1

    "GG! I'm 2nd. Go next." or "The history of FTA"

    Hi everyone. Welcome to my article about FTA through the ages of Shadowera.

    Have fun reading.

    "GG! I'm 2nd. Go next." or "The history of FTA"

    You want to know the story of FTA (First turn advantage)?
    I tell you kids.
    It was a long time ago, back, when allies had no abilities and Majiya and Zaladar dominated the tournament scene….

    FTA back in the past

    It all starts in CotC where the FTA was even more superior than nowadays.
    FTA made you the aggressor by default.
    Because the differential of damage and health for most allies was mainly between one and two in the early parts of the game, you could boardwipe your opponent while still casting allies in very early stages of the game.
    If you combine that with allies, that add one damage by casting them, you were able to kill your opponent’s allies immediately, creating a board situation, that’s very hard to come back from. You had something like Puwen + Aldon, Jasmin + Aldon or Bad Wolf + DMT on your side of the board and your opponent had an empty board.
    The result is, that your opponent is pushed in the defense very early in the game and has to fight back board control where you have the easier job in holding it.
    The advantages for going 2nd were minimal. Having the hero ability one turn earlier does not help your opponent too much, because he most likely used it, trying to get Boardcontrol back, where you then can cast your ability one turn later to negate the effect of his ability, making the situation as before.
    Ability cards could be seen as a defensive tool only, because using them in the early stage of the game means, you are missing resources, to cast an ally in the same turn and thus maybe denying damage, but not fighting for board presence.
    This means, every game went kind of similar most of the time:
    The one with FTA was the aggressor and the one going second tried to defend till high ress where he could use abilities together with allies to regain board control. Abilities (and weapons) that have an effect for multiple turns were superior to achieve that goal.

    The aggressor had the advantage having allies on the board and thus he could use his abilities early in the game, even if not having enough resource to cast another ally.
    For example, if you have already two allies on the board, it’s no problem using all available resources to cast Lightning Strike or Shadowfond on turn four to clear the opponent board. Going second, this will just lead to an empty board on your opponent's turn, where he can just cast a new ally, bringing you in the same spot as before.

    The 2nd disadvantage going first, having one less card, can be negated by smart deck design. Most draw tools back than cost 4cc, often providing you even the 1 missing card (ToK, Wizert Staff, IGG, WotF). When you can provide full board dominance on turn 2-4, you most likely can afford to use your turn 4 or 5 to negate this missing card easiely.
    It also does give you a small advantage over your opponent, because all good draw tools last multiple turns and so you not only negate the 1 missing card from the FTA, you also have your draw tool already on the board, while your opponent does not.

    The Design team strikes back

    The DT of Wulven saw the problem of FTA and tried to work against it in the first expansion DP.
    New allies like "Champion of WhateverItsCalled", “Layarian Seductress”, “Wild Berserker”, “Furion Terror” and “Ironhide Karash” are specially designed to have an impact on the game going second and only being slightly weaker going first.
    You now have tools, were you can cast an ally for the long term board presence and still control the board in the short term like you would cast an ability.
    Also new and cheap abilities like “Fear” and “Snare Trap” give some classes the cheap control cards they need to regain the board at an earlier stage.
    In addition to that a lot of new allies have a difference of 3 between attack damage and health. 3cc allies get 5 health and are less easier to kill immediately.
    2cc allies get a defense machinery to survive more turns early on and thus having more impact going second.

    FTA now
    Now the FTA is a lot weaker than in the set before. Some of the DT’s work to came to fruition and thus we now have an easier time building decks, that can work going both first and second.
    Also it’s a lot easier to build decks working better going second than first.
    One reason why BB is such a beast in the current Meta is because his ability combined with the new Ironhide Karash works so amazingly good with FTA and without. Having the ability 2 turns earlier than your opponent and still having enough damage for a turn 3 board wipe going second, makes this hero very dangerous. In addition the Karash has a great defensive ability, making him hard to kill for your opponent.
    While all this definitive leads to a more balanced and less luck based game, there are still lots of problems to face.
    The FTA is still there and still makes the one going first to the aggressor. The defender got some new tools to defend and work against the aggressor’s board dominance, but still the aggressor is in a key position.
    The defender often needs the exact allies to defend, where the aggressor can decide between multiple allies to establish his dominance position.
    The aggressor can still not only cast allies first, he is also at higher resources first and thus can cast more powerful cards earlier than the one going 2nd.

    The reduction of FTA in other TCGs.
    I do not play too many other TCGs, so this chapter will be a bit imprecise and incompletely.
    There are a lot of different approaches, dealing with the FTA.
    In MTG, the fighting mechanics is the main part that’s working against FTA. Since the defender can decide, what he uses to block the attack with, the FTA is a lot weaker than in SE.
    Also there is no first Strike mechanics and thus no matter if you attack or get attacked, your ally deals damage (apart from some special effects. - Thanks to Pyrogene for reminding me on that)
    This mechanics not only defending the creatures in the early parts of the game from getting killed immediately, it also defends you from getting death raced by allies in the later parts of the game.
    Only really aggressive decks benefit from the FTA in MTG, while more midgame orientated decks, often providing lots of healing the mid- to late game, and thus not really caring about taking a bit of damage early on.


    M&M DoC goes a bit of a different path. In this game, the one going first has tech and first-play advantage, while the one going second has a resource advantage.
    In this game, the power of a card relies on both tech and resources and thus this rule balance the FTA a bit. Also there is attack limitation for most monster, where you can only attack the opponent monster in the same raw and the hero only if there is no monster in the way, creating also some kind of monster protection early and hero protection late.

    Conclusion
    All this anti-death race mechanics and ally protection, SE does not provide and thus this game has a way bigger problem with the FTA than other TCGs.
    The DT tries to work against that by creating cards to deal with the problem and they are kind of on the right way.
    But the problem will always be there and can only be solved by a change in the game mechanics.
    This can for example be accomplished, by combining it with the problem of having no mulligan in SE and thus having a harder time with bad starting games than in other similar games.
    Thanks everyone for reading.
    Commends and criticism are desirable.
    Last edited by painful_smile; 08-13-2013 at 01:53 PM.
    “Let’s show Kira…that the good guys always win.”
    The L of A1 - Evolution in Theory

  2. #2
    1.27 Tournament Champion Raphael Majere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,585
    Tournaments Joined
    4
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    6
    A great read. Thanks!

  3. #3
    DP Visionary Direwulven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,470
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Nice read. FTA is still very powerful in SE.

    Other games such as Solforge and Cardfight Vanguard deal with FTA by prohibiting the first player from initiating the first attack.
    Guardian of the Riding Hoods
    Warrior of the Blue Phoenix
    Greatness, Reborn


    CLICK HERE FOR INFORMATION ON OUR GUILD

  4. #4
    Senior Member Veles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    4,394
    Tournaments Joined
    29
    Tournaments Won
    2
    Very good analysis! Thanks for posting.
    Retired Card Game Designer

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments.
    The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  5. #5
    World Championships 2nd Place Flycheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,037
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Direwulven View Post
    Nice read. FTA is still very powerful in SE.

    Other games such as Solforge and Cardfight Vanguard deal with FTA by prohibiting the first player from initiating the first attack.
    Solforge allow 1st player to play only one card where 2nd player two card. The creature is exhaust when cast.

  6. #6
    Senior Member pyrogene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,160
    Tournaments Joined
    11
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Your reputation precedes you; thought it was a troll guide at first! Nice write-up anyway.

    I think the 2 biggest reason for FTA in SE are the first-strike mechanic and lack of many alternative win conditions (most heroes still need to gun for board control).

  7. #7
    Senior Member Airact's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    3,313
    Tournaments Joined
    5
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pyrogene View Post
    I think the 2 biggest reason for FTA in SE are the first-strike mechanic and lack of many alternative win conditions (most heroes still need to gun for board control).
    I think it's exactly those two reasons.

  8. #8
    Senior Member painful_smile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,178
    Tournaments Joined
    3
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by pyrogene View Post
    Your reputation precedes you; thought it was a troll guide at first! Nice write-up anyway.

    I think the 2 biggest reason for FTA in SE are the first-strike mechanic and lack of many alternative win conditions (most heroes still need to gun for board control).
    Yeah true I forgot the first strike mechanics.
    I will add it.
    M&M DoC has it too but MTG does not have it. Also working against FTA alot.
    “Let’s show Kira…that the good guys always win.”
    The L of A1 - Evolution in Theory

  9. #9
    Senior Member 1ndeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    770
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    +1

    I agree that the combat system favors aggro decks in general. Not just First Strike, but also the act that the attacking player decides "who fights who", whereas in MTG the defending player picks who blocks who. This is inevitable in SE because theres no player interaction during the other players turn, so that games can be quick, as its meant for mobile.

    Ive heard of a tournament system that takes FTA into account. Instead b03 alternating who goes first, you play 5 games, randomly decided who goes first in all if them. 1 point for a win going first, 2 points for a win going second. Something like that...
    A1 1ndeed - The Black Lotus of A1 - A1: Evolution in Theory

    And who are you, the proud lord said, that I must bow so low?
    Only a cat of a different coat, that's all the truth I know.
    In a coat of gold, or a coat of red, a lion still has claws;
    And mine are long and sharp, my lord, as long and sharp as yours.

  10. #10
    Senior Member graphlem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,371
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pyrogene View Post
    I think the 2 biggest reason for FTA in SE are the first-strike mechanic and lack of many alternative win conditions (most heroes still need to gun for board control).
    +1 exactly. I think first strike is really the biggest single reason though -- going first wouldn't be nearly as big a deal if allies traded blows at the same time.

    I think the easiest way to combat FTA in SE is to release many more Defender allies for everybody.
    1.25, 1.26, 1.27: 40 card decks, Big Bad Baduruu
    1.28/1.29 - best forgotten except for Elementalis Prime Grindage

    1.5 - it's all good Naughty Gwenches
    -
    Players Focus Group 1, Missing In Action member of PFG 2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •