Balance Discussion: Furion Terror and Paladin of Unaxio

[Badyuyu]

Wow roustabout! I ment now offense I was simply asking, not knowing about the sarcasm, if that is what he ment. Ahmet if that was intepretet as insulting or namecalling I apologize. I did not intend my comment to be hurfull : )

[roustabout]

Wow roustabout! I ment now offense I was simply asking, not knowing about the sarcasm, if that is what he ment. Ahmet if that was intepretet as insulting or namecalling I apologize. I did not intend my comment to be hurfull : )

My post wasn't specifically directed at you! It was general. I think we've all been guilty of going a bit overboard at some point in this thread.

[ahmet476]

Weapon wielders, especially who can buff them: Amber, Gwen, Serena, Baduruu (yes, even the often ridiculed CotC Baduruu and not res d variant), Darkclaw. Priests, Zhanna in particular. Other hunters. Both Elementals. This makes for half of the present heroes which have good chances against mages, played right.

This is partly related to the topic. As for people taking me seriously or not, I hope they take me more seriously than who said rush doesn't need 3cc and below and MC is not tempo loss not so long ago. I'm outta here.

[Demnchi]

My post wasn't specifically directed at you! It was general. I think we've all been guilty of going a bit overboard at some point in this thread.

Nearly everyone has at some point. I think we still got a good discussion out of it, it just came along with a lot of other comments that weren't necessary. I think it was necessary to discuss this though, as it really was/is an important topic, hence why it isn't locked yet (because there is more than enough here to lock it).

Anyways, I still think these changes are pretty good and nice to have. I personally think it makes the game more interesting in how players will have to come up with ways to prevent their strategy from being hindered by its counter (which, like retreat, really didn't have a counter until now. So its been fun to use steadfast in elementalis decks), not to mention the new strategies that could evolve from such a change, especially in time (such as Eladwen and Nishaven running PoU to use more supernova's).

[JeetKuneDo]

I hope they take me more seriously than who said rush doesn't need 3cc and below

You said that.

Sure, because rush decks "don't" need 3cc and lower at all.

I guess this was (another) attempt at sarcasm on your part. Regardless, it made no sense. My point was that rush decks wouldn't get use out of a mulligan this way because a rush deck will pretty much never get a draw with 0 3cc or less cards. I mean, chances are there's hardly more than 6 cards higher than 3cc in your whole deck. The misunderstanding here was on your part, followed by a sarcastic, personal attack, on your part.

[ahmet476]

It wasn't an attempt. I even put asterisks there, so you would understand the sarcasm.

...because sarcasm equals personal attack LOL. And later you answered me "rush is not what you think it is". It is clear that you don't deserve any of my time. Enjoy being on my ignore list.

[Demnchi]

Alright, enough of this...

Apparently I was wrong. If anyone has something to say about the changes you can join me in the new thread that will be up shortly.

New discussion

Leave this one behind.