Close

Page 42 of 43 FirstFirst ... 3240414243 LastLast
Results 411 to 420 of 427
  1. #411
    Senior Member Helio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,201
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    What we need is a representative of the DT to tell us what is the intention of PoU changes...

    Right now my imagination is running wild (and not in a good way )

    DT lead: team we need a meeting to discuss PoU and FT per the forums. Since the OP has played hundreds of games and we are too busy to play... we should listen.

    DT members: what do we need to test? (Ugh we are sick of testing this game)

    DT lead: nothing! OP did it all. We just need to buff PoU.

    DT members: OK! Do we need to worry about side effects. We don't want another meeting next week to undo what we did.

    DT lead: Nope. OP didn't list any negatives! This is an open and shut case!

    DT members: Great Done.

    So again... would be nice for DT to chime in!

    And just in case... this is meant to be funny not insulting.
    SHADOW ERA, ETC
    Enjoy Trading Card-games

  2. #412
    Senior Member BDK16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Laval,Canada
    Posts
    6,509
    Tournaments Joined
    2
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jacqui View Post
    Have you considered that an indirect nerf to mages was what the DT was intending?
    Ah, did not consider that.

  3. #413
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    176
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Helio View Post
    What we need is a representative of the DT to tell us what is the intention of PoU changes...

    Right now my imagination is running wild (and not in a good way )

    DT lead: team we need a meeting to discuss PoU and FT per the forums. Since the OP has played hundreds of games and we are too busy to play... we should listen.

    DT members: what do we need to test? (Ugh we are sick of testing this game)

    DT lead: nothing! OP did it all. We just need to buff PoU.

    DT members: OK! Do we need to worry about side effects. We don't want another meeting next week to undo what we did.

    DT lead: Nope. OP didn't list any negatives! This is an open and shut case!

    DT members: Great Done.

    So again... would be nice for DT to chime in!

    And just in case... this is meant to be funny not insulting.
    I can't imagine why this would be necessary. Are you asserting that the DT is unaware of the effect this change would have on mages? Its obvious that they know how it will effect the game, and its intentional. To imply in any way that the DT inadvertently nerfed mages with this change is pretty ridiculous. You and others also need to stop with these claims that DT is making these changes solely because of this thread and not looking into things on their own.

    Most forms of control got substantial counters in DP, what with attachment destruction, steadfast, un-incapacitatable legendaries, negative effect removal, etc, so I think its fitting that mages get one too.

  4. #414
    Senior Member roustabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    322
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Helio View Post
    What we need is a representative of the DT to tell us what is the intention of PoU changes...

    Right now my imagination is running wild (and not in a good way )

    DT lead: team we need a meeting to discuss PoU and FT per the forums. Since the OP has played hundreds of games and we are too busy to play... we should listen.

    DT members: what do we need to test? (Ugh we are sick of testing this game)

    DT lead: nothing! OP did it all. We just need to buff PoU.

    DT members: OK! Do we need to worry about side effects. We don't want another meeting next week to undo what we did.

    DT lead: Nope. OP didn't list any negatives! This is an open and shut case!

    DT members: Great Done.

    So again... would be nice for DT to chime in!

    And just in case... this is meant to be funny not insulting.
    I'm flattered at the suggestion that I am so convincing! Lol.
    A1 roustabout ~ A1's Slinking Ne'er-do-well
    A1: Evolution in Theory | www.a1-alliance.org
    I will show you fear in a handful of dust

    Proleptic member of PFG3

  5. #415
    Senior Member ahmet476's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,849
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Yeah, because mages were totally unstoppable since the CotC and after DP release...

  6. #416
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    176
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ahmet476 View Post
    Yeah, because mages were totally unstoppable since the CotC and after DP release...
    No one said that. I was they were strong, easy to play, and a counter to direct damage would be good for the game.

    Address the points people are ACTUALLY making, if you'd like to be taken seriously in a discussion.

  7. #417
    Senior Member ahmet476's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,849
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    I didn't need to address it. The target was hit nevertheless.

  8. #418
    Member Badyuyu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    61
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ahmet476 View Post
    I didn't need to address it. The target was hit nevertheless.
    Wait I'm just reading this and letting this discussion go it's way but you are saying that your answer does not have to actual concern itself with the content of what the other guy said?It'S just you saying your oppinion then?
    Last edited by Badyuyu; 04-30-2013 at 07:12 PM.

  9. #419
    Senior Member ahmet476's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,849
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Well, I was being sarcastic if you couldn't tell. Let's not dwell on that though. Otherwise, I might be offtopic greatly. I said what I have to in here. We'll see what the actual changes will be.

  10. #420
    Senior Member roustabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    322
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Folks, can we please restrict our comments to the topic. I don't think there is any need to demolish the credibility of those we disagree with in addition (or as a means) to defeating their points. Let's stick to the arguments; if someone fails to make an argument, you can point that out without calling that individual names. I'm really unhappy with how this discussion has degenerated in this regard.
    A1 roustabout ~ A1's Slinking Ne'er-do-well
    A1: Evolution in Theory | www.a1-alliance.org
    I will show you fear in a handful of dust

    Proleptic member of PFG3

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •