Close

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Senior Member A1 Seragyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    411
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0
    i disagree with the toolbox approach for the most part..... 4x of useful cards makes for a consistant deck where you have what you need when you need it
    "It gives me a headache just trying to think down to your level."

    A1's Paraniod Android


    http://www.a1-alliance.org/

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    160
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    What I was pointing out is that while you waste your cc, your opponent probably puts real threats on the board.
    The net effect of your combo is just that: -3cc, nothing more on the board, 1 heal, -1 SE on the opp.
    not cc-cost-effective.

  3. #13
    DP Visionary
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    153
    Tournaments Joined
    0
    Tournaments Won
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cosmo K View Post
    What I was pointing out is that while you waste your cc, your opponent probably puts real threats on the board.
    The net effect of your combo is just that: -3cc, nothing more on the board, 1 heal, -1 SE on the opp.
    not cc-cost-effective.
    If that's your point, then I agree with you. That's why I said this combo doesn't really work well until the late game and you already have other threats on the board or are able to place multiple allies at once. For example, it's effective if you can VO-cycle the PotL's behind an Aeon to prevent an opponent from using a direct-damage SE ability on Aeon.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •