sorry wrong post.... :/
sorry wrong post.... :/
I don't think he needs to be played reactively though. Quite a few people experimented with VoW builds myself included not sure if any of them worked that well but the idea is simple find a way to make his ability offensive and useful every game future expansions may allow for this.
As for the OP I do not think the minimum needs to increase. 30 card decks were problematic when they allowed things like burn decks that could completely ignore what the opponent did and win by turn 7 or 8 (old Maj). I do not see any such problem with 40 cards. As for making a few different QM ladders I would be fine with that but I again do not see any great need to do so. If you really want to use a big deck go for it you can definitely compete at 250 with a 50 card deck probably higher its just less done for the obvious reasons.
Last edited by qaz92zaq; 03-12-2013 at 03:54 AM.
plndrmmrdnlp
@qazzaqstan
Honorary Og http://challonge.com/ogpopup
Strategy Article - Converting between your advantages (how to evaluate your position and determine what to do)
Pathetic burn combos are still quite easy to perform with 40 card decks. In MtG you don't usually have so much burn available at any time due to 60 card decks; but there're many other problems there, like land starvation.
So if they wanna raise the card minimum to 41 I'll vote yes (just put 4x of 10 cards + 1 hero and your deck is done ), probably 50 not.
Bookmarks