Replying to as much as I can:
I like to keep tight, 30 card deck lists.
Chimera >
Plasma Behemoth, because you get a 5/7 on turn 5 (if you drop a Chimera on turn 4 and then Life Infusion on t5). I just think
Chimera is more viable because it does more damage for less resources and can come out sooner. Supermof gave me a similar explanation that convinced me, especially after testing it out. Plus you need 6 resources for
Chimera + Life Infusion, 7 for Plasma + LI. Hrm.... It is a noticeable difference. Plus
Plasma Behemoth really slows you down, as you try to save 3 resources for its ability, unlike
Chimera does 3 less damage but cheaper and sooner.
I don't really understand why anyone would use
Bad Santa unless they were packing a bunch of one cost cards, like
Fire Snake and Sparks (which I don't think are very good for
Zaladar, they all belong in
Elementalis). Also, no, you wouldn't play Eternal Renewal in this; again, that is for
Elementalis.
Atm,
Armor of Ages seems a little slow, but I might reconsider when its cost gets fixed. It is definitely tempting.
Shriek of Vengeance looks like severe card disadvantage to me. It would be more appropriate in a deck that has massive card drawing capabilities (
Blood Frenzy, Bad Santa, Research). However, in
Zaladar, it is only going to mess you up, since you need lots of resources available. Again, HBM belongs in a different type of deck for similar reasons: this deck is about card advantage through slow but powerful cards. HBM is about tempo. This deck doesn't have anything cheap to slip in during turns 1 and 2 before casting HBM on turn 3.
Bookmarks