Guild: Warriors of the Blue Phoenix - Greatness, Reborn.

[aNIMaL]

IT

I want a balloon!!

[Flynn]

Right, it's wulven's job to fix it. That's why the latest update resolves the issue. The mistake they made was allowing the older versions to be able to play with the current latest version. All they need to do is simply to instruct the server to allow only clients/apps with the latest version.

Lastly, the rules of meltdown is clearly established and understood by players. 30 cards minimum.

I personally don't blame anyone for abusing the bug; as u said it, it's wulven's job to fix it. It's just that BP does not want our members to exploit the bug and take advantage of players who DECIDES to play by the rules. Wulven policy =/= BP policy.

I personally don't understand your point of posting occasional tidbits now and then; the case is clear, transparent and closed.

I agree that Wulven should not allow people with old clients to play on the live server which absolves me of all fault, I explain that HERE.

I disagree, the clearly established (and coded) rule is that you must choose 30 cards to enter Meltdown. What the game does to those card from there on is the game's issue.

Thank you. There is nothing wrong with abusing a bug because it's coded into the game and therefore legal.

I post because it needs to be very clear I disagree and I dislike how Mip handled himself.

[Zigbigwig]

Zhou... I feel like winning a 64 person tourney should be worth more than 7 points. Especially since an 8 man is 3 points. If you consider the limited amount of opportunity and the exponential increase of difficulty the reward seems low... Like really low. Just being constructive

Haha thanks for the suggestion chanson. Now if we can summon Zhou to see what he thinks of it.

[Conquestadore]

Haha thanks for the suggestion chanson. Now if we can summon Zhou to see what he thinks of it.

Yea, lately our Janitor been taking alot of whine leaves.

[Raphael Majere]

Zhou... I feel like winning a 64 person tourney should be worth more than 7 points. Especially since an 8 man is 3 points. If you consider the limited amount of opportunity and the exponential increase of difficulty the reward seems low... Like really low. Just being constructive

Yeah, hahaha, the first system was even worse, lol. The reward for wining a 64 man is the same as winning a 8 man.

We are still refining it, so I suppose the system will get better as time goes on.

All in all, it's for fun, the prize is not big. (Although it could be)

When the discussion for the points system was announced, everyone had good ideas so it was hard to balance it all. For example, winning a 64 man is clearly more difficult than a 16 man; but by how much? And what about byes? Auto wins? Lol.

I suppose we'll take another vote before the sept month starts and see if there will be Any changes.

[Zhou86]

Zhou... I feel like winning a 64 person tourney should be worth more than 7 points. Especially since an 8 man is 3 points. If you consider the limited amount of opportunity and the exponential increase of difficulty the reward seems low... Like really low. Just being constructive

I agree with you on this. But the frequency of 64-man tournaments is very rare nowadays. Still in the process of refining.

Thanks for your feedback buddy, always appreciate it.

[Zigbigwig]

Zhou your jokes are the worst!

oops wrong thread

[Zhou86]

Zhou your jokes are the worst!

oops wrong thread

/cries.

[Zigbigwig]

Congrats BP for winning GWZ, and mad props to our homie Snider for bagging it!

[Conquestadore]

Congrats BP for winning GWZ, and mad props to our homie Snider for bagging it!

Totally put it in the sack!