[se036] Armored Sandworm

[MattOG]

[iClipse]

Seems very strong. Almost unbeatable with combat damage, so you'll need removal/crippling blows/etc.. cards for this.

[Drakkon]

This card is going to get nerfed, and I support it.

[iClipse]

This card is going to get nerfed, and I support it.

Maybe just give it stoneskin, like gargoyle. Or make it -2 melee damage only, so at least spells can damage him a bit.

[Ekoz]

1) text should read: " Stoneskin 2", so it matches with gargoyle.
2) this card will be nerfed before release. Hilarious.

[Calmdown]

He's actually 2/5 in the latest design version. He should hit test as 2/5.

[Ekoz]

If I may:

As a concept design, the idea of an armored worm is good. But think of it like a crab: super hard shell, but soft, gooey, delicious insides. Possibly lower his health to 1, and give him a very large armor point? For example:

Armoured Sandworm:
3/1
-Armoured Sandworm has Stoneskin -4

That means if you can "pierce" his armour, he's easy to kill.

Just like crab.

[GS]

I think he should be 3/4, same ability, cost 6.

My reasoning?

He's massive. More attack than garg. He should also cost as much as aeon to deploy, if maintaining these stats.

Basically something to be afraid of, like aeon. But not undefeatable.

[Gondorian]

So he is going to be a more expensive version of Gargoyle, who is harder to kill. Make sense. It will be a shame to see all these tough to kill allies washed away by a Tidal Wave.

[Scion]

One of the best new cards. Why 2 attack power already? Haha. I am in for fatties that die hard. You could make him resistable to spells instead of all damage if it proves to be op. Like : Spellbreaker ( Spell damage reduced by 2)