Fire Snake

[Shadow Era]

Annoying little bugger when you don't have any allies in play yet...

[Notthevictim]

Yes.... very annoying little bugger.

[NagaRoyalGuard]

A bit too strong in my opinion... the attack could be reduced by 1. There are cost 4 creatures which are barely stronger than this guy.

[araziza]

Initial thought is too cheap, but i have yet to see it seem unbalanced. Extremely useful.

[Shadow Era]

Yeah, it is probably too high attack if you can have 4 in your deck... Although with only 2 health it can be killed very easily. I'll withhold judgement for now...

[kirothak]

I could see these being a problem if someone draws several early on, could be to over powered, perhaps drop it to a 2/1 to be more inline with its cost, great fast dmg but dies very easily. again just some thoughts hehe

[kirkwb]

I think in the current combat system a 2/2 for 1 is OK. it should get a chance to defend (deal damage back) to an attacker only doing 1 damage.

But this would be the first 4 of card in my Majiya deck.

[-jFk-]

I think it's ok, because it dies instant when attacked. Of course if you only have 4 costet 2/3 creatures you might get overwhelmed by 4 of these in the first 3 turns but then maybe you should change your deck. I guess it's easy to handle so lets try it out.

[kaboom132]

It's a fine card - fun and annoying!

[kirkwb]

I think it's ok, because it dies instant when attacked. Of course if you only have 4 costet 2/3 creatures you might get overwhelmed by 4 of these in the first 3 turns but then maybe you should change your deck. I guess it's easy to handle so lets try it out.

Agreed, this is where your Base Stats to Cost ratios need to be nailed down. If you start with a 1 cost 2/2, you need to walk up the cost ladder in a sensical way.

I'll write a Blog later with some ideas on base this model under the current combat system.