I disagree. It's not purely about whether a card will be OP in a tier 0 deck. In card balance, we should also think of how the meta is shaped. And my personal feel of the meta is that it's too easy...
Type: Posts; User: Atomzed
I disagree. It's not purely about whether a card will be OP in a tier 0 deck. In card balance, we should also think of how the meta is shaped. And my personal feel of the meta is that it's too easy...
I read people points about how the proposed change to PoU may have implications for future expansions. I did suggested to have a cap on this Spell Protector (for lack of a better word). But yes it...
+1. Wow, I actually agree with Jeet, that's saying something!
To lentan and others, I can see the reasons. But I don't see how a small buff to Paladin will change the meta that much. I don't...
Except that once the cards are printed, there won't be any more changes
You forgot Dagger of Unmaking.
I think your analogy is way off. A lot of the people crying for nerf to MC is newbie. Do you say that players like busti is a newbie and cannot deal with FT?
...
As with the other players supporting the non-nerfing of FT, you missed the point of the whole thread.
The whole thread is about providing options. It is also about buffing a meh 5cc ally.
...
I agree with OP and busti that there needs to be some checks and balance for FT.
I been facing a lot more semi-solo shadow hero decks now that runs EA and FT for board control. Then they use SK...
Connect With Us