Close

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Veles

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. You have no reason to offer this to me, because I...

    You have no reason to offer this to me, because I have no control over who gets to do development, Kyle does. Kyle decided that he will do it. Talk to him about it.


    We are doing that right now....
  2. But you would make a decision in the end which...

    But you would make a decision in the end which feedback was valid and which was not, correct? Isn't there a dose of subjectivity in that as well? In the end your vision of what game should look like...
  3. Well so far we intended in DT to do incremental...

    Well so far we intended in DT to do incremental changes to cards and not risk killing them off completely as it has happened in the past. But given scarce resources we can work with and slow...
  4. Oh wow I can't believe I have to defend myself...

    Oh wow I can't believe I have to defend myself against silly arguments like this. I've been playing this game since 2012, I believe, and have done so on all levels, noobie days, competitive days,...
  5. Over the course of a match that "ramp" adds up...

    Over the course of a match that "ramp" adds up quickly and for 0cc investment that is too good. NC having same ability is not that relevant because they didn't build their deck around it. There are...
  6. When it happens depends when Kyle implements...

    When it happens depends when Kyle implements them.
    List of CotC changes will be posted soon which includes cards not on the ban list.
  7. Those are still happening independently of these.

    Those are still happening independently of these.
  8. Preview of Balance Changes to SF and LL cards for 3.68

    Hi,

    To address current dominance of control priests in the meta, and to make some less played cards stronger, following changes to SF and LL cards are considered for implementation in the next...
Results 1 to 8 of 8