Attachment 6968
So players i defeated gizmo who has a 316 rating against my 0 rating shows you that rating is a number not skill!
That's was a tourney a bo3 btw
Check out BP Leviosablade vs Tj Gizmokiller
Boris vs Threbin
Printable View
Attachment 6968
So players i defeated gizmo who has a 316 rating against my 0 rating shows you that rating is a number not skill!
That's was a tourney a bo3 btw
Check out BP Leviosablade vs Tj Gizmokiller
Boris vs Threbin
OK well, first of all congrats nubby, and secondly, you cant compare rating to skill, because it's obviously an ok representation of our skill, given that we both made it to the finals of this pop up, and this is the second time in a row for me. Thirdly, in my opinion this was a bad matchup for me, in your favor, and lastly the deck I played in this tourney is not what I used to climb in ladder, so its not really a connected comparison, if you understand what I'm saying. Anywhom, congrats again, and imo rating does matter, maybe not so much in this meta, given that plenty of new players can just climb with these rush Aramia, and Lance, and Threbin builds, but it's still a decent representation of how good a player is. Im not saying this cause i have an ok rating, but thats really my opinion. OK Brutal Gizmo out, bye bye nubby u suck :P
AND TJ BEST GUILD OUT THERE! SO JOIN JOIN! :D
You guys should pass out popcorn before you start w this.
Levi, I believe the floor is your?
I don't think ratings have been particularly relevant since when they affected tournament seeding.
Levi =)))) your third show off for winning this tourney :p
Also your rating is 0 because you didn't play .. u reached 300 before
Rating is a loose indication of a players skill. Your current rating is not a reflection of your true rating. It's only a reflection that you did not play any games since the last ladder reset. Which IMO should not reset everybody back to 0. In any case, I'm not sure I understand the point of this thread.